What the hell are you talking about? One day male, other female? That makes no fucking sense!
He could be, on the other hand, shemale. That is entirely realistic. There are cultures where shemales are common and celebrated.
I entirely agree! And there is that one very famos Czech transracial person in the US nnow, so the issue is well known. That would surely help the sales!!!
For sure, way to give Racism a left hook and a right cross!
She is a national hero, did you know she is one of the founders of black lives matter? I think if she and the transracial community were to get behind this game Warhorse would brake records! But first we need a statement from @warhorse saying there will be an option to be transracial.
Why are you doing this, guys?
Donāt make me do it.
BTW, on the street where I live, there is a tiny fishing accessories shop. Apart from fishing rods etc., the owner has about 50 pictures in the window. About 45 are of him with some fish he caught, or him and friends by the water.
Then there are 5 pictures of the owner in what seems as Bangkok in company of what is without any doubt various shemales.
Itās the one with Norway flag. I think that Norwegian shemales in 15 century Bohemia are entirely plausible, just look at the Vikings series.
Great point man ! I think itās a little racist of us to tell our in game dog, that he is a dog without him having a choice. I think it would be great if our dog could identify as a cat if it wanted too, that would make the cat community feel represented, and add more diveristy to the game!
Im glad you think youāre funny. Nobody else does Iām sure. Idiot
Which brings me to the devs choosing the dog breed for the game as mentioned in the last video update. Anyone knows more about that particular, now extinct, breed?
EDIT: Did I hear correctly it is this one? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alaunt
Gosh why so rude? I would hope no one finds me funny when talking about an issue as serious as this. Diversity is never a joke, and the lack of it in video games is a serious issue.
I donāt like your topic!
KC:Deliverance is meant to be played as a FIRST person game. It was announced everywhere from the very beginning! If you donāt like first person, THEN DON"T PLAY THE GAME!
Period.
As an early backer I am strongly against any third person in Deliverance.
I donāt like first person but i LOVE everything else about the game. So I should not play it.
Sorry but that is idiotic reason.
Itās pretty obvious heās not serious and itās pretty funny.
Itās trolling.
*Though OP should use existing topic started by Dan himself (which is itself BTW pretty obvious argument against those who insist that 3rd person view is something like dragons or would spoil the game).
I would say it was an appropriate reaction to an idiotic topic!
Thatās better, what do you say?
Your argument sounds like āI love fast cars, but I donāt like they suck too much gasolineā¦ā.
Either play it in 1st person or donāt, it is up to you. Deliverance was announced as strictly first person game and you should have made peace with yourself on this matter a very long time ago.
You are very wrong. And unnececarily hostile, so please calm down.
This topic should have been joined with other similar topics (the official poll for example)
Though I failed to reckognize this need and now we have on our hands this disaster.
But putting that aside it is alright to want 3rd person view. Not even devs are against it, but the decision was made.
Still I bet that if the third person wont be added officialy later, it will be added as fan mode.
@plaxeko If you read through the Official poll (linked above), you will learn that if there was 3PV implemented it would work only outside and not in buildings.
I hope that the behaviour of some backers will not keep you from posting your ideas and suggestion in the future again.(Shame on you guys)
Im ok with it. Itās just one feature that i donāt like, you are telling me that i shouldnāt play it.
Iām very right according to myself and the better part of the community. If you feel otherwise, Iām sorry, but it wonāt change my opinion! And by the way, Iām as calm as ever. 
This matter was cleared many times before. It is one of the main reasons I backed up KC:Deliverance.
And I wonāt just sit by and watch how some people would ruin my dream game eventually.
Sorry again, but this is how it is! If the modders add 3rd person later, it is their own problem. But I among many, many other people are against an official 3rd person in Deliverance and that was proven many times before, even before you joined the forum team.
I believe this ends our current discussion.
Keep in touch, Proky
Why dont you then just write a comment that explains how things are.
All you did was just say your subjective opinion without any facts, links, nothing.
You just assume that your opinion is more than the one of the others. Why someone cannot fight for 3rdPV just as hard as you fight against it?
Well, anyway. Here is explaining pice of factual information.
Here Vavra explains why it didnt come to making of 3rdPV.
And the reason is āI did not want to piss off 20% of our hardcore customersā. 
There were other minor factors like which you mentioned (the game was presented from the begining as 1stPV)
But the main reason is what you can hear in the video.
Yes dear Proky,
that is correct. I havenāt provided the same video link, because it has been pointed out many times in the past.
Nonetheless, it is a good thing that you showed it once more. Let the people know!
I consider myself one of these 20% hardcore backers and I believe my OBJECTIVE opinion is worth as much as anyone else who backed the game as early as I did. Nonetheless, I also believe that these 20% hardcore gamers are the core backers without whom Deliverance might never had been developed, so our opinion should count for good.
And I will respect Dan Vavra always and forever for being such a man of his word! So rarely these days you could see a developer who actually cares, so he and @warhorse in general will always have my support as long as they deliver what is promised.
Listen nazi. I backed the game early too. Your āobjectiveā opinion? You are toxic. I was trying to spark a discussion instead I get someone calling me an idiot who clearly is one himself and a troll who thinks he is funny but he is the only turd nugget laughing at his own joke. Ugh. Toxic message board. Toxic āhardcoreā fans. This isnāt the kind of community I want any part of and I am glad to all hell this is a single player game. Later.
Only reason why third person probably wouldnāt be in the game are people like you.
I just donāt understant why are you so strongly against it. No one is forcing you to use it.
It is clear that first person is priority and that developers wouldnāt make any compromises because of third person. It wouldnāt take too much time because they already has it in the game.
So why?
