The †roll Cave ®™

you not finished that yet ! no wonder the immigrants are taking your job if you work at that fucking pace :slight_smile:

1 Like

Nah, that is far from truth. The Czechs had to be raiding German patrols of few soldiers for months and had to be declining anyone who wanted to join guerrila and didn’t bring their own guns. Also, the Czech guerila could count on support of Czech policemen who were covering them up and often staging “attacks” on police stations whereby all cop guns got lost and cops a bit bruised. Had they been armed from the beginning they could have focused on doing what really makes difference. Like destryoing German supply trains, killing officers, damaging manufacturing, keeping German forces busy in Czechoslovakia and thus missing from the frontal line.

Example:

Syria? They had over 20.000 unarmed civilians before some parts of military started turning on their own government and letting a flow of arms into civilian hands. Had the civilians been armed from the beginning, the uprising would be much quicker and swifter, and very likely much less bloody (due to its speed). I remember when I happened to come across a protest against killing of unarmed civilians in Syria when I was in Paris back in 2011. For years the insurgents were short on arms, only when ISIS showed up with the Iraqi weaponry did the Syrian Free Army start getting serious arms support from the West.

1 Like

as well as the british providing support :slight_smile: with the SOE .
example

@SirWarriant . she is beautiful


next to one our current ones

1 Like

so tempted to post a little home movie in “Show off your Videos/Screenshots (collective)”

:slight_smile: :slight_smile: :slight_smile: wonder if it would get flagged

one of the best videos out there . he goes from menacing president to school boy in seconds

1 Like

20

2 story house, plus i had to calk every seem, nail in loose nails. It takes a while for 3 people :smile: Plus ive never done it before. and i couldn’t paint over the weekend.

@TheDivineInfidel remember this?

:laughing:

1 Like

YOU FOUND IT !!! MY TREASURE !! :slight_smile: how to piss off a queer in one easy step

1 Like

Oh it did more than that. He left the forum.

Remember what he said to the mods

“i don’t feel safe with people like @TheDivineInfidel and @SirWarriant on this forum”
:smile:

Ah Madaras you were so much fun.

What’s up with no angled deck though…
After all it greatly increases the effectiveness of the carrier and it was a British invention. All U.S carriers have them.

Also why is the decked curved upward? Apparently that a bad design.

"The ski jump flight deck allows the aircraft carriers to dispense with the weight, the expense, and the manpower requirements of steam catapults.
On the ski jump deck carrier the aircraft starts its take off run at the stern, hits the ski jump which gives it an initial positive rate of climb, and then continues to accelerate until it can climb under its own power. The drawback is that to launch aircraft the entire length of the deck has to be clear, which slows down the pace of lunching aircraft, prevents simultaneous launch and recovery of aircraft, limits the size of an air wing the aircraft carrier can embark, and limits the weight of the aircraft that can launch off the carrier.
By contrast, a US Navy carrier with four catapults can launch an aircraft about every 30 seconds or launch and recover aircraft at the same time.

By the way, it’s not only the US Navy that uses catapults. The French Navy’s Charles De Gaulle also uses catapults.

The ski jump deck is not exclusive of the Russian-designed carriers. The ski jump deck feature was pioneered by the British, and can also be found on the Spain’s Juan Carlos I, and will be on Australia’s Adelaide class ships."

This is what i could find on the “ski jump” and it sounds like its disadvantages far out weight its advantages.

The U.S design can launch multiple aircraft and have them coming in at the same time. So maybe its more cost effective?

@TheDivineInfidel @snejdarek

10,076 people died from being in an accident with a drunk driver in 2013 in the U.S.
http://www.cdc.gov/motorvehiclesafety/impaired_driving/impaired-drv_factsheet.html
I propose we have background checks on alcohol, and require people to get an alcohol license.

Alcohol is far to easy to get in this country. Any idiot can walk into a liquor store and buy some beer. Drive down the highway and kill someone.

It’s time to end the blood shed, after all countries where alcohol is banned have far less drunk driving incidents than America does.

Countries like
Saudi Arabia
Afghanistan
Pakistan
Iran
Kuwait
Libya
Brunei
Bangladesh

These countries have far fewer deaths due to drunk driving than Europe and the United States does. They are truly countries we should follow.

@TheDivineInfidel

290 people were killed in drunk driving accidents in the U.K in 2012, 1210 people were seriously injured.
If there were background checks, alcohol licenses or even an out right ban these numbers would drop.


These numbers are much higher than in places where alcohol is banned.

@snejdarek

I was unable to find drunk driving stats on your country, but it’s safe to assume there are more deaths due to drunk driving than in countries where alcohol is banned.

I Smell Bullshit. Some shit about twenty characters.

@TheDivineInfidel South Africa, you need gun licenses and background checks. Yet strangely enough their murder rate is 32.2 per 100,000 people. But their guns laws are far stricter than Americas.

That is fucking insane, do you realize how high that is? 32.2 per 100,000 people.

And apparently their rape rate is 127.6 per 100,000 people!

That makes it easily one of the most dangerous countries in the world. Hmm strict gun rules are helping there.

Would also like to point out that the U.S murder rate is dropping by a lot each year. Especially in the last 20 years, and private fire arm ownership is going up. :smiley:

Well, that is relative. Czech government paid for training and Brits provided it. That is more of a business relationship than real support.

FYI, did you read it? :smile:

A Sten machine gun. Gabčík’s gun suffered from failure to feed. Czech paratroopers were often complaining about the low reliability of British firearms.

Did anyone say that not all NATO countries are taking their preparadness seriously?

@TheDivineInfidel @sirwarriant

2 Likes

Not to sure why they didn’t . There is a lot with it I can’t understand their thinking . The biggest being no catapult system

Wait, what? Context?

Huh, I thought you were older. We’re actually the same age.

My grandfather used to tell us about the sten gun . He was in the miltary police (was stationed in Berlin just after the war ended ) . Used to say that when raiding a room you would pull the trigger and the bullets used to just hit . Floor ceiling fucking everything . Sounds great fun :slight_smile: