The †roll Cave ®™

1 Like
1 Like

1 Like

Im busy working again, but I am still watching bitches.

@TheDivineInfidel @snejdarek @SirWarriant @Skoruligr @Daniel_Boon @DrFusselpulli @ProkyBrambora

3 Likes

Are those potz plantz?

Is that it :slight_smile: …:

1 Like

Bitch please my car would self destruct the moment a unauthorised arse touched it’s seats :smiley:

1 Like

The average Brits sense of humour :slight_smile:

1 Like

Um my arse touched the seat of your car. I drove the damn thing while your girl was sucking me off remember? :smile:

1 Like

Yes they are. 40x magnification.

No chance my missus has standards :slight_smile:

If you look around you can find anything from .22s to .50 BMGs to loan and shoot at ranges.

Western shooting is actually quite popular here with people that like to dress up.

1 Like

really !?

1 Like

Well then I would be fine, it wouldn’t go off for me, because everything machine or biological wants to feel up my phat booty.

1 Like

get in . people are waking up

Just watching some stuff on the Iran-Iraq war. How the F-14s Iran had were dominating the Soviet built Migs.

Well according to some British people in the comment section, its just a lie and propaganda. Apparently that war never happened.

American tech beats Russia tech= lies and propaganda it never happened

Russian tech beats American tech= truth and the U.S sucks

@TheDivineInfidel

The videos do bring up good points, but i still have my doubts.

1 Like

Most of those MIGs were antique 21s and bomber versions of 23s though. Czechoslovakia at that time started fielding MIG 29s which would be fairer comparison (or at least 23s in fighter configuration instead of bomber one).

1 Like

The F-14 was introduced in 74, the mig-23 was introduced in 1970.
In addition the Soviets told Iraq it was capable of matching an F-14.

They did have some fighter versions, and they still failed against the F-14.