Dear Community,
I am currently writing a science paper on historical authenticity in computer games with KCD as an example. In order to get some direct input of some actual players, I have prepared a list of questions regarding authenticity in the game, both historically and in general. My main questions are: What makes a game authentic for you and how important is each of these aspects. Is it important to you to have realistic game elements, even if these might affect the fun of the gameplay? Which aspect might be less influential when it comes to authenticity? You can just go through my list and use it like a checkmark list or tell me in your own words, it is up to you So let me know, what is of high value to you when it comes to authenticity in KCD?
- Should all important characters be historical persons with the correct name, age and standing?
- Should places, armor, cloths and all esthetic elements in general be historically accurate and look exactly like they did?
- Should the dates of events exactly match historical sources?
- How important is the social development of the character?
- Would you like to create your own character instead of playing a set role?
- Are features like fatigue or food that gets rotten important for an authentic feeling?
- Should it be possible to influence the outcome of the events by the decisions you make, even if that resulted in a counterfactual outcome to the historical events?
I am excited to read your opinions on this topic and would really appreciate any comment given Please note that I might use your answers in one way or another for my analysis on the topic, so if you do not agree to that but still like to contribute something on that matter, it is obviously still appreciated. Just let me know in case you would not like to be part of it and I will leave you out. Either way, I will not use names. Have fun discussing
Best regards,
Max