heart of iron IV
âMassively appraisedâ, doesnât mean âgoodâ.But, I guess, suum cuique.
Winning almost all GOTY also doesn´t mean good? Universaly positive reviews aswell?
Wonder what your definiton of âobjectively goodâ means. Probably âWhat I likeâ huhâŚ
I understand that subjectively everyone likes different things, I for instance can´t even smell JRPG´s (any of them), but I definitely won´t say they are not âgoodâ.
Never trust reviewers.
Not even when there is general consensus with other reviewers and players aswell according to user_score and steam user reviews? I don´t think so
Careful not to slice your veins on all that edge.
Next time, spare me the ad hominem.
I am 39 yerars old and spend most of gamming time on CSGO. Would say too: you could like or not⌠but quality is another thing; not subjective.
Thinking on quality, a good reference: BAFTA Awards 8 april 2017 : http://www.bafta.org/games/games-awards-2017
âŚtwo games at hightest quality hit me the harder this year:
¡ LIFE IS STRANGE: all beautifull work: story, photo, filmming, chraracters, dialogue, MUSIC ! 20-30 hours
¡ THE WITNESS: puzzles in an open world. really pretty and surprising. Be Intelligent and patient
or dont try.
Special mention for DOOM : hectic, music. INSIDE; good but maybe easy. UNRAVEL music.
FIREWATCH beautifull but⌠too much short. 4 hours.
Awaiting KCD for best game at 2017 XD