The game began to look much worse than the beta version. Will it be possible to return the beta graphics?
1 Like
It run better for me, textures loading prompt and it looks amazing. What do you mean excatly?
1 Like
The game looks absolutely fantastic, performance issues in my case due to my old machine running it. Way better to the beta version…
1 Like
The range of drawing vegetation and forests in the beta version were farther and better, if you played in the beta you should notice it.
1 Like
The performance is better than the beta version, but the graphics and drawing range have become worse because the graphics have cut compared to the beta version
1 Like
Exactly. those who backed the game from day one and played the alpha thoroughly saw a very different game visually.
Most of those people who are coming here claiming the game has n0 issues are not even backers. Notice how a lot of them do not have badges or have the ÂŁ25 version of the game.
The draw distance and level of popin are much much worse now.
hmm i can’t agree, i played alpha and beta as well and yeah there was a little downgrading in the woods but this is known for weeks now. I read about before release here in the forum and other sites.
I wonder how many backers didn’t noticed such things. .
I would say the alpha runs better than beta, i had many problems with late loading textures and rough shadows and shapes in beta… I think we got a great game after a, in my eyes, terreble betaversion.
but is just my opionion, who am i to say you are wrong 
In the beta forest was beautiful here is an example screenshot. Where podevalis surround lighting which was in the beta version
Still screenshots beta version of, why in release there is no volumetric lighting and such detailing?
Yeah looks good but to compare it need to be same spot same time same weather etc…
and than a screenshot…
But yeah looks great
I was thinking just the same. Maybe it was cut down due to performance issues ? But I agree with you, beta was looking better IMHO, it’s not only the lightings, it’s also tied to contrast, I think that colors and grass in particular was more realistic and didn’t have that over sturated green. They have boost the colors of the game for release version and it doesn’t look as realistic as it was in beta.
I hope that they will adress perf issues as well. When wandering around in forest or campaign it’s almost ok but in town even a very good rig (GTX 1080 Ti 11G - 16 Go RAM - SSD Drive and i7) only allows a maximum of 31 Fps. It’s a bit dissapointing on that point.
3 Likes
the change of the colorsheme was announced a few days/weeks ago… i didn’t remember when exactly but i read befor launch… its like the downgrading a way to stabilze the perfomance… as you said.
Our pcs are identical and our performance is more or less the same 
ie: Unstable
Some videos on youtube are helpful too for owners of GTX 10xx like this one :
he is pointing out the three options that seems to be the most performance heavy right now.
It’s only been a prologue, I’ll wait for a good mod. Thanks for the link, I hope soon will do as it was in beta version. (Google translator)