all i’m saying is i want to understand the problem. it’s too vague right now. he already deflected the same question twice before. i don’t understand what he means when he says the depiction of rural medieval geography only included things typically found in such a place. what other things does he want to see? just curious
Well, same but more lifelike (not about nature, but more about areas touched by people). OK, I’ll stop this discussion and will hope for the future)