The pay to be released option when people surrender is total trash. It is a great idea, you can spare people but in return you get stuff. Now the issue is the lack of money you get. Why would I spare someone with 2k armor if he only has 22 groshen to be released? I am nice, but not that nice. I figured they should also give every item of value more as 100 groshen. Else this option is not a viable option to pick.
1 Like
Nowadays Its call Forfeiture seizure for profit by law enforcement agencies and taken to extremes. It is being challenged in a high court by one guy. for having some weed on him in his $35k range rover the fine would have been $200 . They took his car and slammered him. Vehicle was his way to his job. now he has to borrow his mothers car as she noe rides a bus to kidney dialysis.
I have no idea what this has to do with my topic whatsoever. Maybe elaborate some more because now it looks like you looked up something random from wikipedia and copy pasted it here.
1 Like
you said that henry should pay by losing all items 100G or more for a game fine of far less. The same Idea and just as popular.
I am not focusing on Henry. I can just flee with horse. I was talking about when you have an enemy who surrenders, you can let him pay to be released. I rather kill the enemey if he has 2k armor, rather than get 22 groshen and releasing him.
I never give the option. I take it all and their life. To Paraphrase and old bumper sticker:" Don’t steal. Henry doesn’t like competition"
This option is for those with kind heart who don’t care about more loot because they are stuffed with loot in their own chest because no trader has money to buy them, so it’s better to get direct cash than store precious items which might never sell. And you’re over encumbered.