There is a difference betwin gtx970 and a 1060 to run this game? Whit a 970 should i be able to run on ultra settings? Together with a i7 intel and 8g ram Thanks
I donât think you could run it in ultra with each of them. but your 970 should handle it. i donât have a clue about the difference in performance between 970 and 1060 but steam says this.
Minimum:
Betriebssystem: OS 64-bit Windows 7 or 64-bit Windows 8 (8.1)
Prozessor: Intel CPU Core i5-2500K 3.3GHz, AMD CPU Phenom II X4 940
Arbeitsspeicher: 6 GB RAM
Grafik: Nvidia GPU GeForce GTX 660, AMD GPU Radeon HD 7870
DirectX: Version 11
Speicherplatz: 30 GB verfĂŒgbarer Speicherplatz
Soundkarte: Integrated
ZusÀtzliche Anmerkungen: These are preliminary system specs and can change!
Empfohlen:
Betriebssystem: OS 64-bit Windows 7 or 64-bit Windows 8 (8.1)
Prozessor: Intel CPU Core i7 3770 3,4 GHz, AMD CPU AMD FX-8350 4 GHz
Arbeitsspeicher: 8 GB RAM
Grafik: Nvidia GPU GeForce GTX 1060, AMD GPU Radeon RX 580
DirectX: Version 11
Speicherplatz: 30 GB verfĂŒgbarer Speicherplatz
Soundkarte: Creative SOUND BLASTER Zx
ZusÀtzliche Anmerkungen: These are preliminary system specs and can change!
Thank you! Hope they optimize it well, God to run it on its best should we have the most expensive card on the market? Jesus
The game costs it. Sad, i wonât be able to update my PC for a few years, so iâll be having to play on low, but itâs fine. The game has lots of other features to be played, not only graphics.
A 970 should be able to run ultra settings, if you donât insist on 60+fps at 4k res. More reasonable requirements would be âaboveâ 30fps and 1080.
Exactly how well it will run with only 8GB RAM, well that may be more of a limitation overall.
I thought, they were talking about 60 fps on 1080 with gtx 1080.
I think i saw on a interview where the devs said that the game would run on 30 fps?
For consoles, i guess. If youâre talking about yesterdayâs AMA.
Just want to play the game at 1080p with the best textures and fps possible thank you!
I do have 1060, if Lieste saying, that your card might handle this, then mine would too. Letâs hope, that weâre gonna be able to get this on max.
Letâs hope
But my CPU is a bit dead from rendering, but letâs hope.
dev said they used 1080ti on during the video âGreat Haste Makes Great Wasteâ But the graphics werenât that good compared to IGN video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN9JUTZ3ODM
I guess, R.I.P me then. At least, iâve YT and twitch.
Not at all Sirius, I already told you that you can play fine on your rig at medium settings at 900p of resolution.
The video âGreat Haste Makes Great Hasteâ was recorded at 4k using a 1080Ti.
Ah-h-h, i forgot. Just saw 1080ti and lost mood instantly. xd
The ram they recommend on steam ( and most aaa games) it isnt about 8G? i could upgrade to 16 but it seems a lot hardcore
16gb times are closer.
You will need to page data more often with less RAM - perhaps âall the timeâ if the amount is below what is needed for the current render target, and the world state.
A CPU and HDD will be more loaded with paging, and will have less available for the real-time running of the loaded game assets.
8 GB should be âenoughâ, but having more seldom hurts.
I can run the unoptimized beta at itâs max graphical setting at around 25-30 FPS at 1080p with my I7 2600k 3,4 MHz + gtx 970 + 8 gb ram.
Been a while since i last tried the skirmish at the end but I guess I had some stuttering in there that could be solved by more RAM but iâm No expert.