#1

Will there be PVP or TeamDeathmatch maybe held in small arena’s with small Team’s of 2 to 4.

Does the community Like this idea.

-if so Betting and Watching these events could be an idea.

3 Likes
#2

I can see where this is going and would appeal more to mainstream gamers but I just don’t get it in RPG games. That’s right Bethesda you SOLD OUT.

#3

God. I personally don’t hate you, but this post really pissed me off. It was already bad enough when the developers caved in to consider adding co-op, but now people want to make this a teamdeath match?! What’s next? MMO?!

You guys are truly ruining games for yourselves. I thought gaming was finally leaving the casual quick fps arcade games and taking the next BIG jump to making perfect games. But I guess I was wrong because people still want games to be easy so they think they’re good at it.

GREAT THANKS A LOT. MAYBE IN ANOTHER 10 YEARS?!

5 Likes
#4

Why are people so hysterical in refuzing the multyplayer? All that “destroing game” and “what will be next”… you can rage aggainst good graphic as well

Multyplayer is fun and it’s voluntery. Only problem is, that there is no time to implement it as developers focuse their effort on singleplayer which is the right thing. But generally I won’t be aggainst it.

#5

IMHO, PvP, arenas, and every kind of non-coop multiplayer should be nothing but a spinoff of the game. KC: D is a single player RPG. Coop could fit in, but competitive multiplayer is for an entirely new game.

1 Like
#6

Actually when you say multiplayer you think of Chivalry… which is wrong. Even multiplayer can be done good. For example PvP sparring 1v1 to test your skill against friend. Think of it more like Tekken then Counter strike.

I am just trying to say that even Multiplayer can be original and unique. So I would love to see it.

#7

i dont mind waiting for another 20years for a multiplayer version of this game, pvp games are everywhere, but its really hard to see a good singleplayer rpg with good storytelling and refreshing concept these days. right now i just hope the developers can focus on singleplayer

3 Likes
#8

I agree no multiplayer until singleplayer is polished and shining.

4 Likes
#9

Multiplayer for a game like this would take away development time and could potentially lead to a half baked mode at the expense of the main game. So no to multiplayer.

1 Like
#10

Well no one is saying that multiplayer should be made at th expanse of mine game. I take it that we are taling about fully developed single and multiplayer.
Of course there this thing called reality that goes with this parasite: money.

#11

It would come at the expense of the main game though, especially since the main focus of the game is the single player, developing multiplayer would require setting aside staff and money for such a project.

#12

Yes please make a proper single player first. I can see that MP can take a game further (in a completely different direction though) but proper single is the priority. If you have resources maybe have a game ready for adding MP later and leave the community to take care of the rest… if it is even possible anyway but all I need is proper single.

#13

Multiplayer does have its place in games personally I don’t like multiplayer at all in any game, Mario Kart is the exemption but that’s only because I can do it with my whole family. In a game like this it will only take away from the final game and use up funds that can be spent making the game itself better as a whole.