great we might be getting our own version of obama
although i prefer the name obama to this guys
great we might be getting our own version of obama
although i prefer the name obama to this guys
They would do what ever the governor told them to do. The national guard answer to the governor alone.
Never said all the nation. I said if they wanted to do a gun grab quietly and take out the bigger militias like the oath keepers which consists of ex military who fight drug cartels. If they wanted to avoid a full scale rebellion quiet would be the way to go. If the American public ever got wind that guns were being confiscated there would be blood.
I’m not talking in residential areas. I’m talking about the people who live off the grid who are vets and pack serious fire power and also probably belong to a militia. They could take them quietly without anyone knowing.
That would never fly. The only they could pull it off was quickly and quietly. I bet they would use the military on the vets who would be the biggest threat. They would probably just use Swat on people like me.
At least i’m not the fool who pays taxes and worships an inbred family. You put far too much trust in your government. Governments have been responsible for the most murders throughout the human history. So being a bit wary of the government is not stupid its using common sense.
I would also like to add that 90% of the things i say about the government going tyrannical or taking our guns come from ex soldiers like yourself.
Obamas real name is Berry Sorento. No sure why he thought Barrack Hussein Obama was a a better name. But Berry is a terrible name too.
then you better get used to blacks rioting monthly. 25% of your country going on food stamps 6 trillion dollars of debt in one term.
I guess not, but who knows!
Make it a stretch goal
I quite agree how ever that looks real so i’m not going to complain
I just hope the finished product doesn’t rape my computer.
@McWonderBeast what do you think about all the Feminists wanting to take Andrew Jackson off the 20 dollar bill?
@snejdarek @TheDivineInfidel what do you think as Europeans?
HA ludicrous . never going to happen .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3040, topic:21032”]
That would never fly. The only they could pull it off was quickly and quietly. I bet they would use the military on the vets who would be the biggest threat. They would probably just use Swat on people like me.
[/quote] nope why bother way to expensive . simply make it illegal offer an insensitive to hand in your guns . be fair to say a large portion would just hand them in . no doubt you will come back with how strong the american people are but the fact of the matter is alot simply would hand them in , in exchange for cash etc
the others would simply be dealt with like any other crime . not many people would be prepared to shoot a police officer and you know it . if they did shoot an officer they would send in the swat like any other situation .
see you seem to think they would take all your guns in one night which is stupid it would be done over many many many years . slowly tightening regulation . but again thats just your conspiracy theroist coming out again .
you watch to much alex jones you have been brain washed by some prick who exploits you by getting you fixed on his bullshit ideas so you watch his videos which he makes money from when in reality he makes no sense and just screams .
then again thats the US all over shots fired
makes what they say no more right .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3040, topic:21032”]
At least i’m not the fool who pays taxes and worships an inbred family. You put far too much trust in your government. Governments have been responsible for the most murders throughout the human history. So being a bit wary of the government is not stupid its using common sense.
[/quote] weary of my government ? common sense ? paranoid i think is the word you’re looking for . European politics and us politics are very very very different how our governments are run are very very different
Sure because they’ve never used the military for gun confiscation before or arresting people before…
That would never happen. Not in a million years. Your ancestors learned the hard way when they tried to take our guns at Lexington and Concord. We didn’t “hand our guns in for cash”. 14 men armed with muskets stood in defiance of 700 British regulars. Most of them died but at least they died for something.
You’re think of British people. British people are passive and always trust the government. Brits handed in their guns but Americans would not. I for one know that the 30 million vets living in our country would probably rather die than give up their freedoms.
But you’re saying that conspiracy theorists are crazy assholes who have no military knowledge. And i just proved you wrong…
Yes i know how European governments operate. 12 million citizens dead under hitler. 20-60 million dead under Stalin a few million dead under the Turkish government. Close to 3 million dead irish under the British crown. I could go on all day. There is nothing stupid about distrusting your government. I will repeat my statement. Governments have been the single biggest murderers of their own citizens through out history. Governments rarely have your interests in mind they have and always will be looking after themselves.
Yeah because thats totally how it worked in Australia or pretty much any other country that had large gun confiscation. They did not slowly take them, there was an out right ban.
You watch to much news in general. The fact that people like you think you’re getting truth full propaganda free news from big news sources are fools.
I think there are more issues with our economy and the false monetary system.
Honestly Im more concerned with currency being privately owned then whose face is on it.
All this feminist and race BS that’s becoming more and more prevalent in the media is for me evidence of an agenda to separate and confuse the public on matters of real concern.
I completely agree with everything you said there.
But you should know Andrew Jackson got rid of the central banking system in the U.S during his presidency. He was heavily against the currency being privately owned. He was almost assassinated after he got rid of the banks. Just a coincidence i’m sure.
There were also two other presidents who got rid of central banking. Lincoln and Kennedy. They were both killed.
whatever . of course .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3047, topic:21032”]
But you’re saying that conspiracy theorists are crazy assholes who have no military knowledge. And i just proved you wrong…
[/quote] proved me wrong in what way ? conspiracy theorists are crazy the fact some have served makes them no less crazy . its nothing to do with knowledge of the military its common sense . that they would do it slowly over many years and NOT send the SF units sneaking in assassinating anyone who has served in the army . listen to the shit you’re shovelling seriously .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3047, topic:21032”]
Yes i know how European governments operate. 12 million citizens dead under hitler. 20-60 million dead under Stalin a few million dead under the Turkish government. Close to 3 million dead irish under the British crown. I could go on all day. There is nothing stupid about distrusting your government. I will repeat my statement. Governments have been the single biggest murderers of their own citizens through out history. Governments rarely have your interests in mind they have and always will be looking after themselves.
[/quote] you can keep your tin hate mate , but you aint convincing me to put one on
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3047, topic:21032”]
Yeah because thats totally how it worked in Australia or pretty much any other country that had large gun confiscation. They did not slowly take them, there was an out right ban.
[/quote] didnt send the army rolling down the streets taking guns either . they used a buy back program i believe .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3047, topic:21032”]
You watch to much news in general. The fact that people like you think you’re getting truth full propaganda free news from big news sources are fools.
[/quote] i dont actually you will be quite surprised how little i read and when i do i dont take it for gospel like you may think . as alot of news now days is journalists voicing their own opinions
yea i didnt get it why do they want him removed ?
I will have to fact check that but it wouldn’t surprise me.
It still does not matter though its more of disgrace to the name of Andrew Jackson to be on privatized money if he was against it.
Did anyone else watch this speech by Michelle Obama?
I have yet to watch it in full so I won’t give an opinion but from the clips I have seen I understand all the commotion its caused on the interwebs.
Yep British citizens may be cowards who would never stand up to their government but Americans sure aren’t.
Totally thats why the National Authorization act labels veterans and gun owners as threats to the government. Also the police are constantly saying we need mraps for the gun owners and veterans.
Are you seriously denying all those holocausts that took place in Europe in a time period of around 50 years?
Because the citizens gave them up without a fight. American citizens have a completely different mind set when it comes to governments. We understand that governments are dangerous and are not to be trusted.
Thats just why you link major news sources as proof during are arguments …
Because modern feminism in a nut shell is men hating. They wanted a women on the money and they claimed Andrew Jackson was the equivalent to hitler and want him gone. But in fact despite the trail of tears he did a huge amount of good for our country.
He also was the commander at the battle of New Orleans
yep of course .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3054, topic:21032”]
Totally thats why the National Authorization act labels veterans and gun owners as threats to the government. Also the police are constantly saying we need mraps for the gun owners and veterans.
[/quote] ohh yes
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3054, topic:21032”]
Are you seriously denying all those holocausts that took place in Europe in a time period of around 50 years?
[/quote] yep exactly what im doing ]
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3054, topic:21032”]
Because the citizens gave them up without a fight. American citizens have a completely different mind set when it comes to governments. We understand that governments are dangerous and are not to be trusted.
[/quote] well yes you are the all seeing all sensible american population after all
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:3054, topic:21032”]
Thats just why you link major news sources as proof during are arguments …
[/quote] in some cases yes .
so the blokes a terrorist . he is where he belongs in the depths of hell
You still have a queen and pay taxes to her in the 21st century nuff said.
Gun owners and war vets are listed as threats.
When i listed all those holocausts you made a tin foil hat joke… So are you denying they happened and calling them conspiracy theories?
Terrorist? He was defending U.S land in Louisiana that we had purchased from the French.
The British terrorists invaded that land and they got their asses handed to them. The U.S troops offered a bit more resistance than the people the British usually fought. Islanders with grass skirts and blow darts.
typical . constantly going on about issues black people face . as long as black people play the race card racism will always exist and the same with sexism and every minority