Stop thinking so narrowly, we have discussed far more topics then guns.
I never said that you never acknowledge the evidence present by others but that you have a tendency to not do so.
There have been many times you do not refute the claims you simply dismiss it.(kind of like the above quote)
Yes then I pointed out how hypocritical it is for you to call him a hypocrite when you yourself are just as often doing the same thing.
If I have ever called you stupid or dumb it most likely wasn’t direct (you will flat out call someone stupid, I will refer to a response or thought as being stupid not the individual) this is also not something I commonly due. (unlike yourself and thedivine who can go at it like two spoiled children slinging shit(usually in jest).
Yes I very commonly employ a condescending tone toward people when I perceive them as displaying their ignorance, don’t think yourself special or singled out there.
My point was you generally (not always) come off condescending toward anyone or ideal that you disagree with.
I do so when I feel it appropriate, also a major difference is I can acknowledge and accept such criticism when it is given v.s. refuting it utterly and never waning in my opinion.
Do we really have to go back over the concept of perception v.s. intention?
I missed worded that previously I should have said sympathetic rather then sympathizer.
I would not take pity, but I empathize with the human condition and understand fully what its like to fight inner demons and mental illness.
I have hurt people, physically and mentally because of my own personal issues. Remorse is unpleasant but it is a profound teacher.
Because I was not condemned for my actions I was able to grow intellectually and emotionally, and was even given the ability to attempt to reconcile with those I hurt.