The †roll Cave ®™

Off-topic
#6353

Al Qaeda members are very well trained . they have very much perfected the art over the years . ISIS are still evolving and they’re relying on people who have never really touched a gun to carry out a massacre after some simple "this is the trigger point and pull it back " training

[quote=“snejdarek, post:6342, topic:21032”]
That could have very well be outcome of the gun jamming during the struggle. One of the Americans said that he had a round in the chamber which didn’t fire, he thought it was a dud round, but I’d bet my money on jamming.
[/quote] this was only in the AK47 . the primer had been struck but the rifle failed to fire .

as for the hand gun . he fired a shot off perfectly fine (must of already been chambered ) but he had no magazine . so it seems he dropped it XD .

[quote=“snejdarek, post:6342, topic:21032”]
That is surely true. How many people will one 7.62 round go through? 5?
[/quote] id imagine at that range quite a few . but i dread to think of the injuries from ricochet’s etc .

#6354

I got it now just wasn’t making sense of it in its original context.

#6355

Well wasn’t it you who said that tapping the bottom of the magazine is a movie bullshit?

My personal experience is that it really does sometimes happen that the magazine release gets depressed during every day carry. I tend to slightly push on the bottom through the clothes now and then, even though the negligent release happened to me just once or twice.

Is there any source on the pistol? I very much doubt that he had the P08 Luger, it’s probably the French confusing the Luger round for Luger pistol. Anyways interesting change from typical terrorist Tokarevs and Makarovs.

If that’s really the case then fuck, fuck mate, all luck in the world was with the people on the train.

#6356

Kinda reminds me of the cruise ship captain who bailed at the first sign of trouble. He then tried to lie and say he “fell” into his private life boat.

#6357

it is :slight_smile: no need for it .

[quote=“snejdarek, post:6355, topic:21032”]
Is there any source on the pistol? I very much doubt that he had the P08 Luger, it’s probably the French confusing the Luger round for Luger pistol. Anyways interesting change from typical terrorist Tokarevs and Makarovs.
[/quote] i have not heard anything on the actual pistol used .

[quote=“snejdarek, post:6355, topic:21032”]
If that’s really the case then fuck, fuck mate, all luck in the world was with the people on the train.
[/quote] life has a strange way of coming together :slight_smile:

#6358

yea happens alot :slight_smile: always tripping and falling into them life boats

2 Likes
#6359

Oh my god. :smile:

“We even named the first one ‘Billy.’ We hoped that having an advanced, self-aware electronics component in the F-35 might give it some kind of edge, with maneuvering and target-tracking and whatnot. But that one just didn’t have any fight in it. We had to keep it on a tether after it snuck off one day. We found it three hours later, just hovering in a meadow in Fairfax, Virginia, watching bees pollinate flowers. Damned thing wanted to be a bee, too.”

Best part.

This is the best article ive seen on the F-35 so far. :smile:

#6360

If only it were true.

1 Like
#6361

Well hey, it may not be a self aware plane. But, it is the most expensive piece of shit America, and her allies have ever created. :smile:

Edit: it actually has costed 1.5 trillion.

#6362

All that technology and money is waste being spent on weapons, successful or not.

Imagine those resources actually being used for AI research.

#6363

Oh the military is for sure researching AI, and creating them.

That is until we get attacked, not likely i know. But stranger things have happened. All your advanced scientific aint shit. unless you can protect it.

#6364

Undoubtedly but as weapons, not a means for benefiting the majority.

Almost allot of our technological advances originate from military projects.

#6365

Well would you say the internet benefits the majority? Because that’s a U.S military invention. Don’t quote me on this, but i believe cell phones originate from military as well.

Yep.

#6366

There has never been an attack on the U.S. soil that has not been a red flag event used to create war.

Roosevelt had been given advanced warning of the attacks at pearl harbor.

#6367

1.5 trillion … So far :slight_smile:

#6368

Well i could name many. The Brits attacked U.S soil during the war of 1812.

Yes i used to think this as well. But honestly the more i looked into i the more i disbelieved it. The force at Pear Harbor was far too small to fight off the Japanese strike force, which was the largest air attack in history.

So even if he did order them to fight off the Japs it would have been futile. The result would have been the same.

#6369

Please tell me you read that article. :smile:

#6370

That’s because there is not a nation on earth who could take the U.S. on . On U.S. soil . Not because you lack the people who would love to have a go

1 Like
#6371

I agree . In fact I think it would of been worse . As your response would of likely of been to keep the carriers with the main fleet . So the likely hood is , you would of lost the carriers as well

1 Like
#6372

See the internet is a grey area not all computer experts worked for the military and the act of linking computers was speculated, hypothesized, and attempted by many not working for the military.

This technology was created then withheld and used for military purposes prior to becoming public. It was not necessarily created by the military.

Cellphone is non military. Most sources accredit only Martin Cooper, but he had help perfect it.

© 2015 Warhorse Studios www.warhorsestudios.cz