Errmm you must of read that wrong . I certainly did not
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:6805, topic:21032”]
Then why go after a weapon that is only used in 2% of shootings (the Ar-15). Why not go after hand guns are are responsible for the majority of gun murders
[/quote] that’s the main goal for ALL guns to be regulated like in the cezch Republic . They’re just trying to ease it in one gun at a time
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:6805, topic:21032”]
This is coming from the man, who pays taxes to a queen still
[/quote] you mean the guy that pays 60 pence a year to the queen who returns £20+ billion per year to the UK economy ?
Sounds like a solid investment too me .
In total from the highest estimate she costs us about 400 million a year . And she brings in well over £20 billion . Wields huge influence across the globe .
Influentially the most powerful individual on the planet (arguably ) . Having a state visit from the queen is generally a much larger event than one from the U.S. president .
She also blocks out government from having complete control over the country . Meaning our government cannot undermine british values . As the queen simply won’t sign the law off 
Great investment buried in a big show
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:6805, topic:21032”]
So again you think only the government should be trusted with guns
[/quote] when did I say that ? Regulated is the key word here not banned .
Trust is earned not given . Show you can be trusted with a gun through an exam/weapons handling test . Then receive a certificate to own a gun . That’s not oppressive that’s responsible .
The very fact you can have never fired a weapon in your life walk into a shop and buy any weapon you choose , all the way to a .50 cal rifle . Is stupid and irresponsible .
The same as you would a car . Prove you can be trusted to drive and own one
Ps . I really felt like a debate
