The †roll Cave ®™

[McWonderBeast]

https://scontent.fsnc1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xft1/v/t1.0-9/12027711_517515188424252_7988121535084321110_n.jpg?oh=3fcc6cccd4e218bb3e1c9a8d6cb2ab65&oe=569A82AB

[SirWarriant]

[SirWarriant]

@TheDivineInfidel

U.S-1 U.K -0

[SirWarriant]

Well according to black people, the Vikings and Celts were black.

[TheDivineInfidel]

Well according to black people, the Vikings and Celts were black.

[SirWarriant]

Exactly what i thought, when i read about it. They are also trying to say Abe Lincoln was black and so was Mozart.

It’s probably because their history is so pathetic they have to try and steal white history.

TRUE MYTH: BLACK VIKINGS OF THEMIDDLE AGES: Nashid Al-Amin: 9781466960039: Amazon.com: Books

http://www.africaresource.com/rasta/articles/the-ancient-celts-and-vikings-were-black-people-by-dr-clyde-winters/

Of course they’ve been proven wrong, but its all just a “racist conspiracy”.

[TheDivineInfidel]

so how are you feeling about the blood moon tonight ? running for the hills begging for gods forgiveness ?

[McWonderBeast]

You do know that the Irish (one of Celtic groups) Has always been considered Black until recent history?

You should study Scientific racism, some fucked parts of American scientific history.

[SirWarriant]

running for the hills

Yes sir, got my shogun some beef jerky and a twelve pack of beer.

[TheDivineInfidel]

[SirWarriant]

[SirWarriant]

You do know that the Irish (one of Celtic groups) Has always been considered Black until recent history?

Do you mean that we thought they were black up until recent history? Or do you mean they were black up until recent history?

The idea that the Celts, and vikings were black is largely thrown out by most historians, because it lacks proper evidence.

The man claiming Vikings were black is claiming this based off the Saxons referring to the Norse as “black devils”. This is not at all sufficient evidence.

You should study Scientific racism, some fucked parts of American scientific history.

Well, sure there are some racist scientists, but i do not buy that there is a racist cover up of history.

[TheDivineInfidel]

that just about sums up the US population

[SirWarriant]

[McWonderBeast]

Do you mean that we thought they were black up until recent history?

Scientifically and socially they were viewed and treated the same as Negroes, as a sub species.

There was a huge population of Irish slaves (the were commonly treated better, more like indentured servitude yet were still brutalized and discriminated against).

If you have not already read anything on the subject look up the Barbary wars and the Berbers. The Berbers raided many European coasts and took slaves and sold them all over the world they had a vast slave trade. Many people are not aware of white slavery during the same time period as the transatlantic slave trade.

According to observers of the late 1500s and early 1600s, there were around 35,000 European Christian slaves held throughout this time on the Barbary Coast - many in Tripoli, Tunis, and various Moroccan towns, but most of all in Algiers. The greatest number were sailors, taken with their ships, but a good many were fishermen and coastal villagers.

i do not buy that there is a racist cover up of history.

Ok that’s nice, whats the relevance here? no one has mentioned nor hinted at one.

Scientific racism

Scientific racism is the use of scientific techniques and hypotheses to support or justify the belief in racism, racial inferiority, or racial superiority, or alternatively the practice of classifying individuals of different phenotypes into discrete races.

[SirWarriant]

Scientifically and socially they were viewed and treated the same as Negroes, as a sub species.

There was a huge population of Irish slaves (the were commonly treated better, more like indentured servitude yet were still brutalized and discriminated against).

If you have not already read anything on the subject look up the Barbary wars and the Berbers. The Berbers raided many European coasts and took slaves and sold them all over the world they had a vast slave trade. Many people are not aware of white slavery during the same time period as the transatlantic slave trade.

Yes i know about all that, but what what relevance does that have to people thinking the celts and vikings were black? The Irish slaves were very clearly white, it is well documented.

Ok that’s nice, whats the relevance here? no one has mentioned nor hinted at one.

Scientific racism

Well, again how is this relevant to people claiming the Vikings were black?

[McWonderBeast]

Yes i know about all that, but what what relevance does that have to people thinking the celts and vikings were black?

they were viewed and treated the same as Negroes, as a sub species.

The Irish slaves were very clearly white

Not in the eyes of white people of the time.

This quote is from your own link.

The Celts on the mainland of Europe were called Iberians or Silures.(3)though the original Celts were Black, overtime their name was stolen by Europeans. Father O’Growney has discussed the history of the Celts. He makes it clear that the original Celts were the Iberians.(4)

Being defined as black doesn’t necessarily mean they have brown skin like Africans.

I suggest looking into Black Irish.

Who were the Black Irish, and what is their story?

[SirWarriant]

This quote is from your own link.

The link which has been debunked.

Being defined as black doesn’t necessarily mean they have brown skin like Africans.

The people claiming the Vikings, and Celts were black, are claiming they are physically black as in black skin.
If you look at the second link the author of the book has two black guys in viking armour.

I’m not saying the Irish weren’t treated like blacks, I’m saying they didn’t have black skin. The term “Dark invader” or “black devils” could easily refer to their pagan beliefs or their brutality. That is not enough evidence to say they were black, when there is loads of evidence proving they were white.

[TheDivineInfidel]

[TheDivineInfidel]