#9088

That doesn’t stop Britain from being the 2nd largest arms dealer on the planet. Clearly it’s not as big of a deal as you’re making it, otherwise you would never give your tech to other countries.

I’m thinking that Britain is against giving weapons that Iraq can use against ISIS because they are along with the U.S, funding ISIS.

Well could you provide sources, i have yet to hear of anything faster than a Helicopter being shot out of the sky by ISIS.

Okay you’re going to need more than that as proof. A youtube video with a source ive never seen does not prove ISIS has an air force capable of downing modern air craft.

Also that jet in the video, looked like something from the 1960s, an plane that old would be worthless against anything NATO or Russia has.

#9089

they dont , it was more proving they have stolen jets before , they have a number of members who are ex-fighter pilots for the syrian , iraqi armed forces . im not for minute saying they would actually manage to down anything :slight_smile:

[quote=“SirWarriant, post:9088, topic:21032”]
That doesn’t stop Britain from being the 2nd largest arms dealer on the planet. Clearly it’s not as big of a deal as you’re making it, otherwise you would never give your tech to other countries.
[/quote] if i patten a product and sell it to you . you cannot then put that product in your own and sell it off without my permission to do so . its in the contract .

in other words if we are making money from it , its fucking fine :slight_smile: its business .

i can sell my product to ever the fuck i like , but you cant sell my product unless you have my permission

#9090
#9091

That is probably the case. The Czech law says “zcela zjevně nepřiměřená sebeobrana”.

zcela

quite
completely
wholly
entirely
fully
totally
absolutely

zjevně

manifestly
obviously
evidently

nepřiměřená

disproportionate
excessive
undue
inappropriateto sth

sebeobrana

self-defence
self-protection

I.e. you don’t need to stay within what is reasonable, you just shouldn’t stray away from reason completely.

#9092

maybe its not , that means the same thing as ours .

you cant use " completely obvious excessive force "

same as our law was clarified as you can kill someone who enters your home and threatens your life , your families life or your property , but you cant chase him down the street and kick his skull in . because that would be excessive

you could however chase him down and use whatever force needed to restrain him

#9093

Mig-23, made in the 60s so its old as fuck.

#9094

i didnt say it wasnt , you’re just splitting hairs because you love a debate :slight_smile:

1 Like
#9095

so keep it reasonable ?

if someones breaks into my home and i feel he threatens my life , i have the right to use lethal force against him and have the full support of the law , as do you in prague .

if someone runs into my house from the back-door and takes my microwave i cannot chase him down and smash his head to bits with a shovel , that wouldnt be reasonable .
you also cannot chase him down and gun him down as he runs away . or beat him to death. correct ?

#9096

You cannot do that in the U.S, who ever told you that is full of shit.

#9097

??? when did i say you could

#9098

There is a difference between keeping it reasonable and avoiding being completely unreasonable.

I can conduct citizen’s arrest and once he defies that violently …

Anyways, I’d just point a gun at him and as long as he would be going away from me (notwithstanding whether with microwave or empty hands), I couldn’t care less. If decides to go against the gun, then it is his own decision.

#9099

In a super old thread. You said Britians self defense was unlike America where you can shoot someone with who is running down the street with your gaming pc.

#9100

so can i

i can restrain and use whatever force need to accomplish that .
my point is what does your law allow you to do differently than the law of the UK other than you can own weapons for the sole purpose of defence . its just worded differently is all

[quote=“SirWarriant, post:9099, topic:21032”]
In a super old thread. You said Britians self defense was unlike America where you can shoot someone with who is running down the street with your gaming pc.
[/quote] errmmm you’re going to have to quote me on that

#9101

eeeerrrrrrmmmmmmmmmmm Already searching for it. :stuck_out_tongue:

#9102

the castle doctrine is actually part of English common law which not many people actually realise

The term derives from the historic English common law dictum that “an Englishman’s home is his castle”. This concept was established as English law by the 17th century jurist Sir Edward Coke, in his The Institutes of the Laws of England, 162
The dictum was carried by colonists to the New World, where it has become known as the castle doctrine.The term has been used in England to imply a person’s absolute right to exclude anyone from his home, although this has always had restrictions, and since the late twentieth century bailiffs have also had increasing powers of entry.

#9103

Found it, i only had to sort through 800+ posts. :smile:

#9104

bastard ! :slight_smile: i was likely just trying to provoke a reaction from you :wink:

#9105

Hahah, no that was long before i ever posted on this forum, at least by a year. You and @snejdarek were arguing about fire arms, and self defense laws. :smile:

By the way we are nearing the 1 year anniversary of our beautiful troll cave.

#9106

sounds like an average week on this forum :slight_smile:

1 Like
#9107

We are all the heart and soul of the forum. I was looking at all the closed threads last night, and they had a pattern. Me you and @snejdarek were the main posters. :smile:

1 Like