If the Pope is infallible as Catholics claim, then therefore Pope Urban was infallible in his decision to call a Crusade. So what is wrong about that picture?
1 Like
I think it had more to do with the fact that it mentioned blunts, and getting laid. 
My family isn’t delusional when it comes to the real reason behind the crusades, ive seen to that.
It mentioned blunts and getting laid, but is said to put down the blunt and it isn’t about getting laid. So again, no problem.
1 Like
Try explaining that to a person who thinks Reptilian shape shifters rule the world.
Good Lord, are you serious?
I’m afraid so, it’s partially my fault. I started getting into conspiracy theories a while back, and if you click on one of those videos all you get is bat shit crazy videos recommended to you. So my mother started watching them, but didn’t draw the line like i did when it came to reptilian shape shifters. 
I fail to see how you can be a devout Catholic and also believe in lizard men. But I guess that is none of my business.
Well my uncle believes that aliens were commanded by god to artificially inseminate the Virgin Mary, and he still claims to be a devout catholic, so i don’t see why believing in lizard men would be out of the question for a Catholic.
Man, I though Catholics were weird when I found out you guys keep and display the bones of saints. But this takes the cake.
4 Likes
I honestly think it’s just my family. Did i mention that i also have a Schizophrenic great uncle, who recently took a priest hostage inside the confession room, and the police had to be called?
No, no you did not mention that. All things considered, you’re lucky you are only as crazy as you currently are.
2 Likes
Your soul is wieghtless before God, my son.
Deusl ALWAYS vults Holy Crusades!
Now go in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti.
1 Like
Why always when I think I’ve seen the worst of it, I am always wrong?
Like when I read about that gang rape in Sweden that left the victim in a wheel chair. Punishment? 2 years for each of rapist. TWO!
And now this comes up @thedivineinfidel
1 Like
We are debating about China being invaded stop changing the situation .
I’d highly doubt South Koreas ability to deploy and support them tanks any way . Having 2,500 tanks is one thing . Being able to deploy in combat , support , arm and maintain is a completely different thing .
Even the US would struggle supporting such a number of tanks which is why the west as a whole is opting for IFV’s and APC’s over tanks because they are quicker , don’t require as much logistics and leave a lighter footprint . [quote=“SirWarriant, post:10090, topic:21032”]
LOL, no we are not, where the fuck are you getting this from? I was just comparing Chinas military to Iraq, saying it’s a quantity over quality deal. You clearly need glasses.
[/quote] yes we are you compared China to Iraq in the situation of the gulf war .
I knew it had to run in the family
2 Likes
No i was not, and i never was. I never once brought up China being invaded, not once, other then the comment about air superiority, but that was only after you brought it up. I was comparing the Iraq army, to the Chinese army, and i asked you to provide evidence of their modernization. Unsurprisingly you have yet to show any.
It would be right on their border, so they definitely have an easier time of it then China, besides the vast majority of Chinas tanks would be utterly destroyed in about five seconds by South Korea’s tanks. As i stated earlier they only have 600 of their newest MBT’s, and I’m skeptical they would deploy all of them to one location.
Let’s also throw in the enormous lack of experience the Chinese tank drivers would have. South Korean tank drives are constantly training with U.S tank crews, who are the most experienced on the planet.
Edit: Apparently we had almost 1000 tanks M1s, and m60s, deployed during Desert storm so that’s not an impossible figure.
Uh no, i compared Iraq’s army to China’s army. Granted China’s is a good deal more powerful than Iraq, but its still far behind the west. It’s a quantity over quality type deal.
The main reason they scare the U.S military is due to them focusing all their time and resources on their anti ship capabilities. Their plan is to destroy our satellites, which help guide our ship defenses, then unleash a huge barrage of the missiles on our fleet, and bases in the region.
If this succeeded we would have to pull back to ironically Pearl Harbor.
i provided you with a full detailed report before from the US government which you ignored . i do appolgise if i cant find proof in the shape of a fat bloke screaming at a camera as i know thats more your kind of thing .
if you are actually saying you dont believe china is upgrading its military you’re ignorant and to put it bluntly thick as fucking shit .
as im kind and because it takes no more than 30 seconds ive provided some links
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:10109, topic:21032”]
It would be right on their border, so they definitely have an easier time of it then China, besides the vast majority of Chinas tanks would be utterly destroyed in about five seconds by South Korea’s tanks. As i stated earlier they only have 600 of their newest MBT’s, and I’m skeptical they would deploy all of them to one location.
Let’s also throw in the enormous lack of experience the Chinese tank drivers would have. South Korean tank drives are constantly training with U.S tank crews, who are the most experienced on the planet.
[/quote] south korea would never be able to support 2,500 tanks in combat i can play your game and say china has 9k tanks but they sure as hell dont have the ability to deploy them all .
south korea is very dependent on us logistical and tactical support .
Recently, Seoul called for another delay of OPCON transition, stating that its current defense capabilities are inadequate to the task, including its command and control, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR), and missile defense capabilities.
but i dont have the time tp get into this . thats my response , disagree , agree i couldnt care less .
thats the US military who without a doubt has the best logistical chain and system on the planet .
conclusion , china is never going to engage directly with the US . end of discussion
Yes, the AMD bug will be gone in the beta. Don´t expect the beta very soon, we have some special idea about it. 
I did not ignore, it simply didn’t share the same opinion that you have. No where in the document does it say Chinese ground forces are even close to NATO levels.
Moreover, the “PLA also notes that compared to highly advanced armed forces, the PLA’s current
information literacy is low and its lack of specialized and technical personnel is constraining
Chinese Strategy and Military Modernization"
More confirmation of what i was saying earlier. And how about you go check out the 30 fucking links i already posted. It mainly talks about their future plans, and their missile system which i already mentioned and gave credit to. Their army is shit period, end of story.
I’m ignorant? Really? 90% of what you’ve said in this argument has been completely false, and ive proven you wrong. You’re the ignorant one you dumb ass. None of your sources are putting Chinese troops anywhere near NATO levels. You didn’t even know that China still drove type 59’s so i’ll take anything you say from now on with a grain of salt.
You’re literally one of the most hypocritical people ive ever known. You spout off how I’m immature, and childish mean while you’re always the first to resort to personal attacks and name calling, because you don’t have a valid argument.
They wouldn’t have to, China only has 600 tanks that could effectively combat South Korean, and American tanks stationed there. 90% of China’s tank force is shit that would be about as effective as Iraq’s tank force was. Training and experience would also give the South/U.S forces a huge fucking advantage and you know it.
China disagree’s with you.