Found out a bit more info on the leaked info that Hillary claimed was hacked by Russia. Turns out it was not hacked at all, someone within the DNC willingly gave it over to wiki leaks.
I liken Donald trump to Jeremy Corbyn here .
Both received record numbers of votes to become party leader and both have large very loud crowds behind them .
When it goes to the election however both will crumble because their views are to far to one side of politics . The centre always wins . Sometimes centre right sometimes centre left but never completely right or completely left .
Centered is exactly what Trump is. Heâs in some ways more a Democrat than a Republican. There are a lot of far right very conservative people in my family who donât like Trump because he isnât right wing enough for them(although they are still voting for him). His actual polices are very centered.
Like you said the best way to win an election is to sway the independents. And even the propaganda news are having to admit that the third debate won him a lot of independents.
Russia is waging information war on US and judging by your posts, they are winning biggly.
Havenât play planes for some time. Is Yak-9T still such a problem?
I decided to take a break from this game after argue with moderator on forum⊠pricks.
Nothing like exposing Wikileaks emails 30 minutes before they are on Wikileaks.
Russia Today rulez!
I never claimed they werenât i simply said there is no evidence that Russia hacked the DNC. The information was willingly given over, and the man who was implied to be the mole was shot dead. The way Clinton was storing her info a 5th grader could have obtained it.
Every major power is waging an information war, unless youâre forgetting the whole business with the NSA, and Vice President Joe Biden announcing a âCovertâ cyber attack on Russia on national television.
Also i find it really funny that you accuse me of âonly attacking the sourceâ when youâre doing just that. Weather or not Russia hacked the info is irrelevant. The information proves she is the most corrupt candidate ever to run and that she and most of the U.S federal government should be in prison.
There was 80 gigs worth of info dumped after John Kerry threatened Ecuador with sanctions unless they shut of Assanges internet and handed him over to the U.S. The dump was shot all over the web released by multiple sources (presumably his dead mans switch since he has been missing for over a week) that were owned by Assange, but werenât actually posed on wiki leaks till later, so itâs not surprising someone got it up before them.
You just watch too much lefty propaganda and are scared of the big bad Russian bogey man. Itâs all just a ploy ( a very effective one i might add) to draw people away from the info its self, which literally proves most of those âcrazy conspiraciesâ hell one email even references a âShadow governmentâ running the United states.
Eh, my main problems are with the FW planes, they are absurdly op im my opinion. German tankers are complaining a lot lately about being too weak at higher tiers since they have tigers facing up tanks from the 60s.
Now let me ask you this, what do you think of Hillary saying she will go to war with Russian on the debate stage ?
Says it at around 15 seconds
Yeah, but Donald Trump is the loose cannon war mongerer. 
Is this why want her in office? Because she wants a war with Russia?
FW are strong with those 4 cannons but I used to be more worried about Yaks because they are as fast, just more agile and had superprecise trough-propeller cannon.
German tankers are always complaining. Nothing new. But they are still stronger than US and UK in tanks.
Another thing is that Gajin start changing angle of slope armour. It made Tigers B a bit weaker and Soviet tanks a bit stronger (3-5° could add few mm of effective armour).
Yeah, the FWs seem to have gotten a major boost in speed and turning though, but it might just seem like that because iâm playing American planes right now which canât manoeuvre for shit. [quote=âWenceslaus, post:2234, topic:27880â]
German tankers are always complaining.
[/quote]
Yeah they seem really good to me, although in tanks Iâm still in low rank with m4a3 being my most modern tank. Although the Germans do seem weaker at higher tiers at least till they get to the leopard.
The M4A3 (76) ? That is also my highest US tank. Though I played Uk more.
What is wrong with Panthers?
m4a3 105. I havenât got passed rank 3.
Nothing i see German tankers complain about the highest tiers, because they still have tigers facing off against pattons and the other nations equivalents. I have no idea if their complaints are valid or not, but they are facing tanks at least 10-15 years ahead of their own in some cases.
What was this argument about?
My favorite rank anyway. I want to play WW2, not with wireâguided missles. So even though Iâve got complete rank 4 Germans (and jagdtiger) I usually play PzIV, Comet, M4A3, Firefly and such.
On the other hand, Tiger and Panther with BR 5.7 are quite often matched with 5.0 tanks because Germans lack this rank. Those two Germans tanks are really doing well in hteir BR. But I do not play rank 5 so I canât say anything about othersâŠ
There were few of them (Iâve got two warnings already). And as always â storm in a teacup. Simply put, they are rude and not very helpful.
This time it was just a last drop when I asked one for help (explanation why he is locking topics) and he reply heâs not my nanny.
But even when they talk directly about the game.
They once wanted to introduce mechanics called âLast Man Standingâ that would allow one last crew member operate the whole tank by changing position in few seconds.
This âfeatureâ was meant for Realistic and Simulator mode, not for Arcade. They argue to extreme that it is a hardcore realistic feature and that is how it used to be.
Iâm sure they know it is a lie but they want to increase the survivalbility of the tanks so they ignore are arguments and just blame people to be âarmchair generalsâ and not âhardcore enoughâ and such bullshit.
I didnât mean it in a sense of information gathering, i.e. spying.
I meant in in misinformation spreading, i.e. psychological warfare.
No, that is not irrelevant. They have their own agenda which sets what kind of information they let be publicized at what moment.
Like shit he has been missing. There is nothing that would lead to conclusion that he would be anywhere else than on the Ecuador embassy as he has been for past years.
Russian forces are currently as hostiles in 3 surrounding countries that did nothing to provoke the invasion.
Russian government is financing nationalist parties all around Europe, including my own country.
Russian government is financing anti-establishment propaganda in my country to the point that it is omnipresent on the internet.
No, it is not a bogeyman, but a country on a downward economic spiral that has dreams of being a superpower it once was that has a KGB operative at is helm.
What? She never said that.
What exactly happened when Turks shot down Russian aircraft? Nothing.
The main problem with no fly zone is that Russians now have enough anti-aircraft capability on the ground that it can effectively evolve into no fly zone for everyone, but that would still be better than the current situation (given that ISIS is about to lose Mosul and then fall apart).
Really? So she never said she would have a no fly zone over Syria?
A direct quote
"And i advocate today for a no fly zone"
You did not watch the video then, or the countless others where she announces her support for a no fly zone over Syria, and according to that U.S general
âThe only way for us to control the airspace over Syria would be for us to go to war with Russia and Syriaâ.
I guess you know more than the U.S general? 
Yep which every major power does. You are a first hand victim of misinformation spreading because you watch a Clinton propaganda outlet. Every news organisation has just taken to blaming literally every thing on Russia, and you cannot seriously say that the news isnât one sided. Take Ukraine for instance, i do not think Russia are the heroâs here like a lot of people do but i think itâs a lot more complex than just evil USSR gobbling up its neighbours, itâs a proxy war between NATO and Russia, with both sides fighting over influence for the country. Both sides heavily invest into propaganda.
Can you provide evidence that Trump is a Russian agent? You seem to be hinting at that, and your posts certainly imply it.
The information is true sorry to burst your bubble, not even that old witch denies it. She just tries to spin it when asked about it. There is no evidence that Russia hacked the DNC, i repeat none. The information was willingly handed over.
As for Assange himself, he was leaking info on Bush all the time, so he clearly isnât biased, in fact he is a leftist by his own admission.
His internet was cut off, British police were seen at the Embassy with them not commenting. And the embassy cut his internet off, not to mention after he went missing a massive amount of info was dumped.
Oh yes, everyone who is a nationalist and disagrees with your left wing views is a Russian agent! Look i get why you and your country men donât like Russia due to your history, but itâs getting to the point where you are seeing Russian shadows everywhere. Iâm well aware of how rampant Russian propaganda is but the left is just looking for ways to demonise patriotism and nationalism, but saying the Russians are behind it.
Just because someone doesnât want to go to war with Russia does not make them a Russian agent.
Furthermore i cannot seriously as an American point fingers at Russia for invading other nations.
Well if you get your wish the U.S will have someone at the helm who makes Putin look like a saint.
Once again i have to praise the left for how cunning they are. Now they have everyone and their mother accusing right wing people of being Russian agents in order to shut them up. Whatâs funny though is that the most patriotic people are the ones being accused of it⊠It used to be âpeople that love their nation and are proud to live in it are racistâ, now itâs âpeople who love their nation are secretly Russian spies who want to undermine their own nations strengthâ.
Are you functionally illiterate?
Well, that is his opinion, it still doesnât spin HRC saying that she wants no fly zone into meaning she wants a war.
Yeah, just that one side offered free trade agreement (EU) and the other invaded the country with its armed forces. Exactly the same thing.
I didnât say that and I donât think that.
However it is clear that Russia prefers Trump to win the election and is acting towards helping that to happen.
Too many words in the article I linked for you?
Well Bush was president at the time when the information contained in the most important leaks happened, so it makes sense.
It also makes sense that US information agencies learn their lesson and wonât allow the same mistakes to lead to the same kind of leaks.
British police is occupying area around the embassy ever since he set foot into it, 24/7, in heavy gear, and at a great cost.
You are (1) paranoid and (2) reading something into my words that was never there.
So far the only facts regarding election rigging you presented were concerning dead people voting.
The numbers show that although it may happen, the magnitude is so low that it may have no impact whatsoever.
There was never a debate concerning possibility of rigging the election in general.
Again - are you functionally illiterate?