1 Like
I dont know much about this but, isnt wearing confederate flag almost the same as wearing nazi flag?
You are openely saying you are pro-slave?
Iâm going to warn you now . Get yourself behind some cover , @SirWarriant is about to throw his toys out of the pram straight for you over that statement . 
But yes , means youâre a heartless , racist no good bigot "runs for cover "
2 Likes
Slavery was practised by most nations, so using that logic wearing any flag makes you pro slave. The civil war was not exclusively over slavery, in fact the emancipation proclamation was not even put into effect until the war had being going for several years, Lincoln mainly did it to prevent Britain from entering the war on the side of the confederacy, the Civil war was not as black and white as people make it out to be.
Your comparison of the Nazis to the confederates is ridiculous.
Most people who fly those flags are white trash, who drive huge trucks to compensate for their tiny dicks.
Not sure if youâre trolling or not, but ill argue anyway. A good 70% of what he said in his previous video was nonsense, the man even credited the bren with wining the war for the allies.
Not fat enough. And i donât really have bias when it comes to guns, i love them all.
Not that I can agree with him (I simply not know enough about guns) but I think this wasnât his point. Neither that the Bren was better (he said that Spendau was way better in defense). I saw his video before you post it in The Cave and I mostly see that as statement that Bren still did itâs job and was a good weapon and that rate of fire is not the only criteria. Certainly not that it won the war.
My common sense tells me that MG is better and he did not convicted me of otherwise but I donât see his arguments as that unreasonable.
Prove otherwise !
The burden of proof is on him, if you actually think one single piece of equipment is the reason the allies won that war, then you have no understanding of that war. The allies won because they could replace their losses, while the axis could not.
If the Bren was really the wonder weapon that won the war, the British wouldnât have gotten kicked out of South East Asia, and France.
He pretty much said it won the war for the allies, he made a reference about how people say the MG-42 is better than said, âwait, the allies won, and the allies had the brenâ the entire video was very biased and had a lot of wrong things in it. He conveniently forgets that the Commonwealth spent the first half the war losing badly.
Left now using comic books for propaganda.
Anyone who thinks importing millions of military aged males is a nazi, anyone who wants to enforce immigration is a nazi, anyone who wants to keep their land is a nazi.
So he said that if there wouldnât be machine gun that would be enough for the job then British would not advance every day since '44. It is also controversial statement but doesnât meant he claim that Allies would not won the war without it. And so the first half of the war has nothing to do with as he does not refereeing to it as some sort of wonder weapon.
He made citations that Spendau was way better in defense and it was better as an individual weapon.
BTW: They could won easily all the time if they would use longbow.
Ugh⊠thatâs really, really stupid propaganda. I mean - so much that I see it might work the opposite way they want.
1 Like
Hopefully it will back fire, although it could really influence kids reading that, and it is very disturbing that things like comic books are becoming such political tools.
Perhaps, although he does give far too much credit to the Bren. The credit goes to the soldiers, and the generals. Them along with the massive allied industrial power is the reason that war was won.
Hahaha becoming? they always have been bruh.
Captain America was used as political propaganda from its origin.
Quick comics history lesson: Captain America was created in 1941 by Joe Simon and Jack Kirby as a superpowered, super-patriotic soldier fighting the Axis forces. He was famously depicted punching out Adolf Hitler on the cover of his first appearance, in Captain America Comics #1âwhich hit stands in December 1940, a full year before Pearl Harbor and before the United States joined World War II, making that cover a bold political statement.
You probably already knew that, but Iâd invite you to think about it for a minute. In early 1941, a significant percentage of the American population was still staunchly isolationist. Yet more Americans were pro-Axis. The Nazi Party was not the unquestionably evil cartoon villains weâre familiar with today; coming out in strong opposition to them was not a given. It was a risky choice.
captain america 1 1941And Simon and Kirbyâborn Hymie Simon and Jacob Kurtzbergâwere not making it lightly. Like most of the biggest names in the Golden Age of comics, they were Jewish.
Full article on the quote.
Comic books and cartoons have always been favored routes to spread political agendas and indoctrinate youth.
This is different though, they are being used as political tools for on specific party to target another in the same country, and itâs being used on presidential canidates. Captain America punching Hitler and portraying Nazis as evil is much different than saying anyone who has right winged views, or is a Republican or Libertarian is an evil Nazi.
The new Captain America comics should really be honest and say âpaid for by the Clinton foundationâ
Also âmore Americans pro Axisâ? Most Americans pre war sympathized with the allied cause specficly the U.K, due to having similar cultures, and sharing the same language.
The comic has just become complete left wing propaganda, like the little stunt where they made Captain America a Hydra agent. Or how the new Captain America helps the âheroicâ illegal immigrants cross the border while beating up the big bad right winged militias.
Its always been a political tool though, just becuase its not the same agenda doesnât change that its always been propaganda. which is what I was responding too.
Your statement implied that comics werenât political tools, which by the evidence provided is laughable.
Most comics/cartoons were used as propaganda long before it became âsomething for the kidsâ.
Right, i shouldnât have forgotten that, but i think this is taking it to a whole new level, like i said above they are pretty much becoming Clinton for president adds, or anti Trump adds. Calling close to half the country Nazis is a bit different then calling out the shiftiness of another world leader. Itâs still propaganda, but not the same propaganda if that makes any sense.