Troll cave II

[SirWarriant]

He starts with hispanic lynching mob, then continues to point out that hispanics have lowes IQ, implying that they are somewhat inferior to whites.

He also states that Asians have a higher IQ on average than whites, so does this imply that he thinks Asians are superior to whites?

Now as I said, if more unthinking people starts to listen to him, all they are gonna hear is exactly what I said that hispanics are inferior. And that even fourth generation are usless twats.It would be just a matter of time when angry mob is going through streets attacking every hispanian they see.

Hahha,okay then. If anything the exact opposite would happen, i don’t see mobs of illegal whites in Mexico beating the shit out of Mexicans for their support of a particular candidate.

he said (time: 33:18) “i really want to solve these problems”, yet he offered no solution of what he thinks should happen. So what I was getting at by those tree options (help/deport/kill) is that I have no idea where he stands.

SirWarriant:

So because he doesn’t offer any solutions, he is some how condoning the murder of Mexicans? I have no idea where you are drawing these conclusions from.

time: 34:35

"I no longer believe that white people are racist

Again if you compare western society which was mainly built by whites, it is the least racist society. Also from my personal experience with blacks and Mexicans they are incredibly racist far more than whites on average, but it’s okay in their minds because society says only whites can be racist.

[ProkyBrambora]

So because he doesn’t offer any solutions, he is some how condoning the murder of Mexicans?

Maybe. I dont know. Thats the point.

I have no idea where you are drawing these conclusions from.

I am not drawing any conclusions, I am saying that I am not able to draw any conclusion.

You seem to think that I am accusing anyone of anything. Maybe because you want me to be against you, I dont know why, I am just making points about what he is not saying and what I think his word could evolve into.

As I said I find a lot of what he said agreeable, and that is why I am cautious, because he is at the point he could easily said “kill them” or “help them” as the solutions he claims to offer.

Now to make myself clear
"kill/help" options I use are just two extremes to indicate general direction of his solution. Something like good vs evil.
Though I dont think that if he offered any solution it would be black or white.

Again if you compare western society which was mainly built by whites, it is the least racist society. Also from my personal experience with blacks and Mexicans they are incredibly racist far more than whites on average, but it’s okay in their minds because society says only whites can be racist.

i agree with that.
But he generalizes it. There certainly are some racist white people.

[SirWarriant]

Maybe. I dont know. Thats the point.

So you have no idea what he suggest we do about, so you instantly jump to the most violent and radical solution.

I am not drawing any conclusions, I am saying that I am not able to draw any conclusion.

You seem to think that I am accusing anyone of anything. Maybe because you want me to be against you, I dont know why, I am just making points about what he is not saying and what I think his word could evolve into.

As I said I find a lot of what he said agreeable, and that is why I am cautious, because he is at the point he could easily said “kill them” or “help them” as the solutions he claims to offer.

Now to make myself clear"kill/help" options I use are just two extremes to indicate general direction of his solution. Something like good vs evil.Though I dont think that if he offered any solution it would be black or white.

SirWarriant:

I’m not really sure what you’re trying to say. I’m not sure if you’ve watched his other videos but he is very much for non violence and as he calls it “the initiation of force”.

i agree with that.But he generalizes it. There certainly are some racist white people.

Yep…

[ProkyBrambora]

i find this discussion pointless.
You obviously dont understand my point. Repeating it again wouldnt help much, I suppose.

[snejdarek]

Can we remove the presidents of the EU ?

Yes, we can. It was even attempted against the current commission.

EU's Juncker survives no-confidence vote over tax deals

[TheDivineInfidel]

Yes, we can. It was even attempted against the current commission.

no WE the people cannot . did you vote for him ? no you did not . when you’re displeased can you vote against him in an election ? no
thats right there isnt European presidential elections NONE ! . no wonder your country was occupied twice so easily if this is how blind its people are to when they’re getting fucked out of their demoratic rights

[snejdarek]

thats right there isnt European presidential elections NONE ! . no wonder your country was occupied twice so easily if this is how blind its people are to when they’re getting fucked out of their demoratic rights

Oh, so you have PRIME MINISTERIAL ELECTIONS in UK, do you now?

[SirWarriant]

Anyone in here play War thunder (planes)?

[Wenceslaus]

I play both planes and tanks for all nations except Japan.

[SirWarriant]

I play both planes and tanks for all nations except Japan.

Do you think Russian planes, mainly the Yak are op? I also fucking hate how weak bombers are now.

[Wenceslaus]

I think they are a bit, though Yak-9 was a good plane. Just that high caliber cannon doesn’t have that issues in WT like speed loss, making engine leaking an such.

Bobers were a big problem once. I remember that big ones like B-17 were over the target before fist fighter reach their alt and they had enough bombs to end the game.

So I stop fly bombers then except for the new event (EC I think). But yeah, I fly Wellington so even i the enemy just look at me I start to burn.

[TheDivineInfidel]

Oh, so you have PRIME MINISTERIAL ELECTIONS in UK, do you now?

Extremely different the party leader is chosen before the election . When I cast my vote I know who will head government in the event of the party winning .

I do not know that in the EU .

its not democratic one shred . The commission and president are indirectly elected .

Oh and in the UK if I joined a party j get to vote for who the leader is . The decision is not just for members of parliament.

The EU will enter its final years if we leave . France is looking increasingly anti-eu in there polls .

If 2 big players drop out its fucked

[ProkyBrambora]

except Japan.

when i started playing I picked Japan and I regretted it since.
Another problem was that I wanted to play bombers. But they do shit unless you play some special historical mode.

Anyway I sucked at the game even when I was playing british planes, I liked the tanks more.
But now it is uninstalled, gone and forgotten.

[SirWarriant]

Bobers were a big problem once. I remember that big ones like B-17 were over the target before fist fighter reach their alt and they had enough bombs to end the game.

So I stop fly bombers then except for the new event (EC I think). But yeah, I fly Wellington so even i the enemy just look at me I start to burn.

Yeah, the state bombers in right now pretty much make them unplayable. I get one shot by most planes in my B-17, and i always get out climbed by fighters.

I think they are a bit, though Yak-9 was a good plane. Just that high caliber cannon doesn’t have that issues in WT like speed loss, making engine leaking an such.

I think they need to cut it in one area, it has too much armour, too much manoeuvrability, and too much fire power to make it balanced.

Anyway I sucked at the game even when I was playing british planes, I liked the tanks more.But now it is uninstalled, gone and forgotten.

Yeah British planes are under powered in my opinion. The spitfire turns beautifully (although the yak always out turns me which i think is unrealistic) but it dies as fast as a fucking paper air plane, and its guns literally bounce off other planes. I almost uninstalled, but i started playing American and German planes which i think are pretty well balanced.

[Wenceslaus]

I really do not understand planes much but there a lot of people on forum claims that the problem with Yak is that the it doesn’t lose energy as it should during manouvers.
British need to be accurate. They do not have many canons and thr 7.7 gun do not do enough damage.
I can outturn Yak in Spitfire while using flaps, but it’s close. And nobody can outturn Japaan plane!

[Wenceslaus]

Japan is absolute glass canon. They have good planes with best manouverability in the game and have canons. But they often die in one burst.

Yeah, everyone played with me uninstalled the game soon or later lol.
But I was close to it too. They are adding modern stuff they claimed they never will. Like wired AT missles. And some arcade stuff like healing and such.
And I’m only intrested in realism and historical accuracy obviously :- D

[ProkyBrambora]

And I’m only intrested in realism and historical accuracy obviously

don’t know what you are doing on this forum then

[SirWarriant]

I can outturn Yak in Spitfire while using flaps

I don’t really have an issue with the speed of the yak, i more have an issue with how good it is in all areas. American and German planes are heavily armoured and have good guns, but turn very slow and are slower generally. The British planes are manoeuvrable and that is about it. Then we have the Russian planes which are manoeuvrable, tough, and have very good guns.

[SirWarriant]

I feel like shit posting so here it goes.

[ProkyBrambora]

Does anybody know about some good mmorpg?
I am always looking for a good one, but I havent found the one for me.
I kinda liked Tera (gameplay wise), but as a Priest, it was only playable with friends, but they ditched the game and I was not really keen on playing with strangers.