Continuing the discussion from Playable female characters:
There are a few extremely important things for me when I’m looking at new games…
#1. Do the graphics look good?
#2. Does the gameplay look good?
#3. Is there character customization?
#4. Can you choose your character’s gender?
If a game doesn’t satisfy #1 and #2 then it won’t even be considered further. If it doesn’t include #3 then I’m extremely disappointed from the get-go.
If it doesn’t include #4 in the form of being able to play a female protagonist then I’ll just drop it right then and there and not give it further consideration and this is true probably over a good 90% of the time. What’s more, if it doesn’t include a female protagonist I’ll never really get into it, even if I do play it, and I’ll never truly connect.
I played a whole variety of the Assassin Creeds, one of the exceptions to my #4 rule; however, I did not connect with the protagonist on literally any of them. I played Witcher 1 & 2 but I can’t really connect with Geralt either.
Without both #3 and #4 the game is essentially dead to me. Even if the graphics and gameplay are so good that it can get me to play it, there will essentially be zero replayability for me.
I didn’t play games like Skyrim or Oblivion for thousands of hours because the graphics or gameplay were so good because quite honestly neither were that amazing. I played them for so long because of alt whoring. If you aren’t familiar with the term, which comes from MMORPG’s, it’s basically just making alt(ernative) characters… a lot of them. You make one character, customize it a certain way, then go and play the game a certain way. Then you make a new one, customize it in a totally different way (or maybe not “totally” different) and then you go and play the game in a totally different way. In an open world RPG there’s so much possibility for gameplay replayability when you aren’t locked into a static character and are actually able to have good character creation customization options (including gender choice) that it’s mind boggling why someone, when given the choice, would choose against it.
Quite frankly, I think limiting playable female characters to “a line of quests” is basically insulting. It would be about like claiming there’s a King and a Prince playable characters in Witcher 2 because of the two quests you get to control them in. Putting a female character in a few quests where you control them isn’t the same thing as a playable female character and it’s a cheap cop-out when they could have done so much more. They had a chance to really do something great but they shot themselves in the foot, and they’re keeping themselves tied down on purpose.
Most people here, for 200+ posts, seem to just be in one big circle jerk for being totally A-okay with no female main protagonist. I hate to be the one to say this but most people here are already fans of the game and the ones that are so turned off by there not being female main protagonists that they aren’t going to play the game probably aren’t going to be bothered to register and complain about it, especially when everyone is so vehemently supportive of not having the option of playing a female main protagonist. It is for that reason that I felt I must register simply to say what isn’t being said by everyone that feels the same way and can’t be bothered to post it knowing it won’t do any damn good in the end anyways. The fact alone that I managed to get my own first name as a username isn’t very reassuring, to say the least…
Also, I spent over 30 minutes trying to figure out how to even reply in this dumb forum software… worst forum software, ever. In the end I just gave up. This is probably wrong, but screw it.