I don’t understand the content of your question.
Nah. He’s dead.
R.I.P then. A.D 1403 “Died at work” © Guard
1 Like
You were judging how the guards confronted Henry after committing a robbery. In that scene, no guards were present after the killing of said guard and the video continued. Therefore you can’t tell what other guards might’ve done after said killing. So there is no way to know for sure.
Cardinal Sin No.1 The guard has no sword
Cardinal Sin No.2 The guard does not hold his sword hand on the hilt
Would he hold his sword hand on the hilt, when you have your sword sheathed, then the scene would look more believable.
Another nice thing would be if the guard would ask you to put your sword on the ground (depending on the situation), then you could comply, by taking your baldric with sword in scabbard off and putting on the ground.
In this case the guard would be in an upper position and if you flee then you will have no sword 
1 Like
What can’t I tell for sure?
What other guards might’ve done to Henry for murdering that guard.
You mean because they probably didn’t know that Henry murdered someone?
That too, but if he was seen, which they didn’t of course.
I’m not sure what your point is.
Is your point that guards who would have seen Henry killing someone would have killed him?
That could be the case.
I agree. But that has nothing to do with my point. My point is just that the guard who went after Henry should have gotten a hold of him. The guard should detain Henry.
But the guard doesnt know what exactly henry has done
He just saw him running from that house so he suspects a robbery
If I saw correct the Guard knocked henry down and then the conversation begins.
If I was in Henrys situation I wouldnt flee even if the Guard doesnt get a hold of me, this makes you more suspicious and there will be other guards waiting at the towns gates anyway. Plus everybody knows each other in such small communities.
I know. But as a guard you don’t want your suspect to be able to resist while you interrogate them. First you’d detain them, then your fellow guard would interrogate them.
Motion capture don’t like, when you touch other people. They can’t make such animations. Hard to explain this. 
1 Like
I think a detainment wouldn’t pose a problem for motion capture. That’s not so much touching.
What they said is that sex would be a problem for motion capture because then people lay on top of each other, which makes it impossible for the tracking cameras to see the white dots on the motion capture suits.
Wouldn’t say that, they have to animate the gestures without touching, like the love scenes and then to manually reanimate the touching partss
1 Like
It might be done, if it was a cutscene with playing, but it’s just gaming situation. Idk, doesn’t bother me, tbh. 
I think they could just animate a detainment. No need for motion capture.
Just ask someone from development, why they didn’t make it. I can understand why, but if you want to get 100% truth answer - ask them.