For those complaing about lack of diversity

Story & Setting
#61

My comment was referring to you equalizing pointing out there are too many white people as anti-white.

You are right about Asia but this whole discussion is basically a western thing (as far as I know), thats why we talk about Hollywood. Let the asian continent have their own conversation about diversity if they feel like it but it’s a different culture, different history, different discussion and not really an argument for the topic at hand.

Sure, there are dishes where bananas don’t match and where parsley doesn’t match but in the end you should eat enough of both of them for a balanced diet.

(You really destroyed my analogy with your friggin’ parsley! :smiley:)

#62

The only nations told they need diversity, are white western nations.

image
image.jpg711×541 100 KB

The actual definition of diversity is not anti white, but the way most people use it now a days is, because when they use it, they mean less white people.

1 Like
#63

Most people? Now US represent “most people”?

#64

You can see plenty of that nonsense in western European media too. Many videos, and articles of politicians, in the U.K, and Germany saying things like “diversity is our strength” in regards to the demographic changes, or celebrating the fact that London is no longer majority ethnic English.

#65

This is reflection of the refugee crisis in political agenda in some countries like Germany or France, nothing more.
And “anti-white” nonsense in Germany sounds like revers Nazi, this will never happen. By definition.
Diversity is diversity, only in US diversity mean “anti-white”.

#66

If you are adding diversity to a majority white nation, you’re making it less white. They don’t attempt to tell any other nations that they need to be enriched by other races.

And when people say Europe is becoming more diverse they are speaking in regards to it becoming more brown.

I’m not sure why you’re unable to grasp it.

#67

What are “white nation” is? Oh man, its weird.

#68

Lol, now you’re just playing dumb because you have no argument.

If you can grasp the concept of anti white the you know damn well what I mean by a white nation.

#69

not nuanced view of the world. in japan and korea, the crash in live births and marriage has resulted in men searching for brides from abroad. this is especially true of those who live in rural areas. after Korea’s Kim Yeongsam’s Segyehwa (globalisation) policy there was a huge push to consume things foreign. literally being white and speaking a little Korean could land a guy or a gal a spot on TV. in the 90s, the Korean govt paid to put vast majority white English speakers in school throughout the country to teach ESL even if their credentials were iffy at best. English speaking people of color weren’t similarly received. similar kind of stuff in japan. and even to some degree China.

they aren’t ‘we are the world’ but they certainly do actively consume the white and exotic/foreign. largely white movie stars and personalities were and are paid well to do ridiculous TV commericals spoofed a bit in movie Lost in Translation

after Steelers won the Super Bowl and Hines Ward was named MVP, Korean govt changed its immigration laws to give people of mixed blood a path to citizenship. that was heretofore unheard of and reversed in significant part the need for the decades long SJW efforts of Pearl S Buck foundation and others

#70

No.
This is really weird for me. When you say “white nation” did you mean in US exist “black nation” and those two nation not one American nation?

#71

The U.S was founded by whites, and up until the 1970s was over 90% white, and today it’s 56% white. So yes the U.S was a white nation, and still is in many ways today, although in the not so distant future it won’t be.

#72

prior to civil war, over 40% of lower south was black/AfrAmer. now, over 100 counties are at least 50% black/AfrAmer. in some places, based on population, it’s less white than the appelation white nation might suggest

#73

Whites were still the overwhelming majority of the population.

And that was the demographic trend until very recently. The U.S was actually getting whiter through the 1940s-1950s.

#74

in aggregate sure. but in those states and counties, no

#75

That’s irrelevant to the overall population though. What bearing does it have on my point, especially since the majority of them would have been slaves?

That’s like saying California isn’t a majority Hispanic state because there are northern counties which are 90% white.

#76

the US isnt a homogenous blend. ergo: in some places, based on population, it’s less white than the appelation white nation might suggest

#77

I never did it was a homogeneous blend. I said it was overwhelming majority white up until very recently, so much so that it would be considered a white nation.

And what is the “Appalachian white nation”? I’m guessing you’re trying to peg me as some racist hillbilly from the Appalachian mountains.

#78

in some places, based on population, it’s less hispanic/latino than the appelation hispanic/latino state might suggest

#79

check yourself . neither said nor implied any such thing

#80

Yes but that’s irrelevant to the overall population.

© 2015 Warhorse Studios www.warhorsestudios.cz