Rating play content added
0 voters
Text description of my (2) play content rating:
thereâs a ton of thought put into the DLC. you can spend a lot of hours in your new âhomeâ. itâs just the depth and breadth of ashes specific activities are limited. thatâs not unreasonable for a $10 DLC
Rating game framework/mechanic added
0 voters
Text description of my assessment of (3) game framework/mechanic:
we got a new mechanic for triggering cityscape/landscape changes (ledger and conversation). we got a new investment mechanic (Pribyslavitz chest). we got more integration between past decisions/behaviors and future interactions (recruitment). we got a new rep mechanic (judgments). we got a more customizeable combat trainer/simulator (combat arena).
If you could make up to 3 enhancement(s) to ashes, what would they be? Pick top 3 choices.
0 voters
Lots of 10âs there⊠
I wish the armor and weapon displays were voted a bit higher 
Great idea to post these polls, @frelmedieval
late but so what . Invalid poll for me I see 4-5 I want. 3 ainât enough
you want 4, 3, 2, 1? over inflates the average score but we already have a sense
counting from the top 1,2,3,4,5,7 &10
Mini-Games in Taverns should be in ALL Taverns.
Ordering drinks and food and have them delivered.
The inability to truly interact in them is very dissatisfying.
Top thread dude. The devs should take a look at This. Surprising reception is so poor. I rate this DLC a 6 but most people consider it a 4 or less. Damn⊠wh lost some goodwill on this. With me for sure.
you shoulda seen the look of confusion of Prokoph(sp?) face when the poor reception was brought up on the live stream. Like he did not conceive it possible.
They acted like it was a silly idea. The also played down/ignored the hard questions and played up the ones that made them look good. I watched the stream live and saw it all.
At least they know they did shit. This is a relief. What did WH expect? That we take any shit they throw at us?
I really hope someone from WH sees whatâs going on in this forum and what people think about this DLC, even though itâs the janitor.
Instead of doing this crap, they should be focused on resolving the bugs (many created from previous patches) and finalizing that game.
They also said that you hafta play the DLC from a new game. Then why the H E double toothpicks can you do the DLC in a game already under way? I call B.S.
I did this. And my frustration reaches the skiesâŠ
But donât forget, âThe Amorous Adventures of Sir Hansâ are coming⊠And i do not know what to expect⊠More quests with a âcomedy settingâ?
If i want to see comedy i go to Youtube and watch videos of Donald TrumpâŠ
Hmm, interesting to have been pointed to this thread and skim over it. I have to disclose: I am not âone of you guys,â i.e., the early adopters or Kickstarter backers who breathed the project to life. I first learned of the game as a result of a Steam âDiscovery queueâ (or whatever they call them, basically they got some algorithms that look at the games you play and liked and then suggest some stuff to you . . .). This was, I dunno, a year maybe before it actually released? Maybe only 6 months. I put it on my Wishlist and when it came out last year, I had a look at the online scuttle butt and it sounded terrible, so I took it out of my sphere of interest.
Then a month or so ago, Youtube (amazing how these 3rd parties play such a critical role in âmarketingâ these days eh!?), or to be more specific âYoutubeâs suggestions algorithmsâ put a video on my right hand âsuggestedâ column with something like âUltimate Kingdom Come Deliverance Review . . .â lessee if I can find the video . . .
Yep, that is it. THAT video sold the game to me!
So I went on Steam store, noticed I could get the âultimateâ pack, which included everything (all existing DLC) for a discount and dived in head first.
All this to say: for me, âFrom the Ashesâ is: (a) a seamless part of the overall game at this point, for which I paid . . . maybe $4 or $5? I have no idea what it retailed for at the âhook the early adoptersâ phase of marketing . . . Not trying to be mean here, seriously . . . (b) After ~200 hours of play, I have only now gotten to the point where I discovered Pribislavitz, much less clear it, and get to the point where From the ashes comes into play.
As such, Iâm in no position to respond to the survey, and even if I were, Iâm coming at it from a different perspective than you guys, who bought it fresh off the presses, after having been engaged with the game from the beginning and having âfinishedâ the game probably and been wanting something to extend the game experience.
Nothing Iâve said is meant to invalidate anything anyone else has said or to generate argument or contumely, but merely to point out: the market is a highly segmented thing.
i believe the following still applies:
If you could make up to 3 enhancement(s) to ashes, what would they be? Pick top 3 choices.
most popular choice - involves a substantial investment and although bastards doesnât directly address it, i think it may do so indirectly
2nd most popular choice - this still stands.
3rd most popular choice - involves a substantial investment and WH has shown no interest in this redesign
4th most popular choice - this was essentially mocked during the livestream as KCD isnât FO4
So what Iâm gathering here is: you have the impression WH are taking the âcheap wayâ and trying to justify it?
Could be simple cash grab 
, could be that Prokop, Viktor et al think weâre full of shit 
, could be WH created a house of cards that could come tumbling down by modifying things 
, etc.
In business, guessing vendor intent can lead to counter-productive client outcomes. So, iâll try to frame things in a little less loaded manner
Whatever WHâs actual thoughts, the effect is that our (client/customer) feedback doesnât matter to the level of vendor taking action⊠this includes resistance to add something as simple conceptually as a servant NPC (to execute bathing/mending tasks)
Horse Armor . . . Horse Armor never changes . . .
I did not know that i have to chose between blacksmith and armorsmith 
