what you just provided there has no basis what so ever . so what generals are let go due to budget cuts . whatever you shrink from the bottom has to be shrunk from the top .
as for the retired generals , thats just a man having a moan every soldier will sit there at one point at say "what a load of bollocks this is " bet you do it in your job too .
that does not mean he is suddenly going to infringe marshal law on you . get real , not many of the US troops would carry out such an order either and you know it .
you just dont like obama thats it .
only the americans could possibly take a number of generals moaning about how the government is being run and turn it into obama imposing a dictatorship
You’re so full of horse shit. You’ve linked several blaze articles as proof of your arguments before but now its crap when i post it. Sorry bud over 200 top officers have been let go since he came into officer along with our nuke commanders. Why? Because the military doesn’t like or agree with anything he does. He’s simply replacing them with people loyal to him. It has nothing to do with budget cuts. But you’ve shown your self incapable of having a logical argument and you’re just going to deny all the sources i give you as “internet crap” even though i bet you listen and watch the state owned BBC or CNN and trust every word they say.
I’m glad you’re not only an expert on the Chinese and Russian military but you’re also an expert on the U.S military.
Gotta love the Onion. 
There is a huge difference. Between posting a factual source and posting an article of some guy expressing his opinion .
So what 200 officers have gone . You think the president gets a say in nit picking every fucking officer that goes hahaha . Fucking deluded . I don’t claim to be an expert in anything . But I have a great deal more knowledge on these matters than you do .
You read to much horse shit on the Internet .
look at all the regular soldiers that get sacked each year . Is that Obama sacking them too for disagreeing with him ?
Maybe you should write a letter to the commanding officer of the exercise telling him you don’t wish for any of his troops to step foot on your property.
Then if they do be a real patriot of your rights and shoot them . Go on their just trying to steal your guns anyway right ?
This shows you don’t understand the American command structure. Most of these men fired were top generals. The commander and chief aka Obama tells them what to do. Which means he is the only person who can fire them. As for the article it talks about all the generals Obama has canned. That’s a fact not an opinion.
Yes i fully believe they are. The guns they want to ban are they guns that would give us the only chance of resisting them. Semi autos and full autos. If they really wanted to ban the gun that is the most dangerous why not go after handguns? Not to mention the National authorization act saying anyone who is a veteran or stockpiles food, ammo, or guns is a terrorist.
1 Like
president obama does not pick generals to be sacked . the president rarely deals with defence outside of the joint chiefs of staff . he passes what he wants done to them and the sectary of defence and they act upon that . the president does NOT assign commanding officers of particular operations .
yes he may have reshuffled the joint chief of staffs but thats pretty fucking normal .
quite from the us governments defence website
"The Office of the Secretary of Defense carries out the Secretary’s policies by tasking the military departments, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the unified commands."
president is merely a fucking policy maker .
quote me the names of the top commanders he supposedly sacked so i can look into them .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:2402, topic:21032”]
Yes i fully believe they are. The guns they want to ban are they guns that would give us the only chance of resisting them. Semi autos and full autos. If they really wanted to ban the gun that is the most dangerous why not go after handguns? Not to mention the National authorization act saying anyone who is a veteran or stockpiles food, ammo, or guns is a terrorist.
[/quote] then dont allow them onto property . simple . use your second amendment and defend your home .
"this could be your last holiday so make the most of it " died
1 Like
@SirWarriant as you see here . our sense of humour is to take the piss out of every nation on earth including america . but that does not mean we wish you all dead 
1 Like
Goddamnitfuck.
We will be liberating you soon don’t worry.
And who do you think tells the joint chiefs who to fire? THE COMMANDER AND CHIEF. Many people don’t realize this but the presidents main role is to be the commander and chief of our military.
Yeah im going to fight off navy seals and green berets from my door step.
We don’t need your oil we got plenty in Alaska we just need to use it.
Impossible. The British soldiers are god like immortals. They can go without food or water and defeated 90% of the German army on their own. Also history is wrong. American farmers never beat them they are unbeatable. What really happened was the Continentals were defeated against by these god like men. But they got bored of America and left. But those dirty fat Americans rewrote history into a lie claiming they beat them.
You’'ll find even dumber Obama supports in America. Also Ohio is full of a bunch of inbred s so its not surprising people actually like her there.
@SirWarriant
Now, this is interesting. On a New Year’s eve 2012, a 63 year old guy was attacked by two 20something gypsy brothers in a Czech bordertown. He shot them both, one fatally. Case was closed as legitimate self-defense. There were many demonstrations at the time, kind of like Czech Fergusson.
Now some gypsy activists from a different part of the country want to hold a demonstration against the prosecutor’s decision not to re-open the case (together with the father of the dead attacker). The surprising part: over 100 local gypsies already signed petition against the demonstration and may even start their own counterdemonstration.
@TheDivineInfidel: The old man would be most probably dead/with debilitating injuries if unarmed that night.
1 Like