its common knowledge that the fighting did not end and was violated time after time . it was about as stable as the current ceasefire in Ukraine
what a load of shit . real life iron man armour hahahaha ill believe it when i see it
Still it wasn’t war. It was a very uneasy peace but the fact remains the United States was not present when South Vietnam fell. Had they been present it most certainly wouldn’t
Well you can check multiple sources i first read about it a while ago in popular mechanics. They said it would be put into service by 2025
You guys talk about some depressing shit, who cares who wins when people are killed for a political agenda.
1 Like
not those apache man, the apache got beaten by disease not military might.
Im going to say to all you moda fukas that each millitary has its strong points. ours is pilots and long range marksmen, along with special forces units such as the navy seals. our army is meh, and the the only infantry we have thats really worth a damn is the army rangers and the FR Marines. I would say Russia has very good AA along with artillery, and great brittan seem adept all the way around (besides special forces, but nobody can beat the KSK)
britian has the most highly trained and experienced special forces on the planet , even US generals prefer to use British special forces over US SF when possible .
such as hunting the scud missiles during the golf war , the US commander of the coalition gave the role to the SAS .
as a whole the british army is the most experienced and well trained however we lack in kit and numbers making our capability to project that power alone limited .
the US lacks in training and individual experience but makes up for it in equipment and numbers .
when you combine the two nations you have yourself a very formidable force. a force that only russia or china could do much about
most deaths in them days during war were disease really
im afraid KSK is better.
Um, i dont think so. Plenty of our military have actual combat experience, but also like i said we have amazing fighter pilots, and that is mainly because alot of them grew up driving tractors 
we will have to agree to disagree here .
KSK is good but no where near the experience of any US SF let alone British SF
also the standards expected of an SAS candidate is far higher than that of the KSK this is visable in pass rates the KSK runs at 30%+ where as the SAS is less than 10% normally for the SAS out of about 200 men on day one about 3 will pass or maybe none
[quote=“Daniel_Boon, post:764, topic:21032”]
Um, i dont think so. Plenty of our military have actual combat experience, but also like i said we have amazing fighter pilots, and that is mainly because alot of them grew up driving tractors
[/quote] please tell me your just trolling
I am just kinda being a dick because it seams like you are just being a flag waver lol no offense intended by that statement, im a hardcore flag waver. ANYWAY! im serious about the pilots though, look it up man they have very similiar control layouts, it wass alot more in world war 2, Vietnam and korea with planes like the mustang and the “thud” F- 105. alot of the newer planes have alot of automated shit now but stick control is still the same.
dont know much about flying a jet so cant comment much all i know is ive received air support from pretty much all air forces deployed with ISAF and pretty much all of them hit the target apart from the odd occasion which is normally down to a error is relaying the target rather than the pilot missing
im not talking about ground support im talking about jet to jet dog fights.
Although some of those guys in the a-10s are accurate as fuck with that gun. and thats pretty impressive.
ya exactly thats why i named the conflicts in my previous post lol.
you would be hard pushed to find any US pilots with a Air-to-air kill.
not true! plenty of korean airforce vets still alive today. and you wont find a single UK pilot who has an air to air kill today either, because i dont think and air units were dispatched from the uk during the korean war only infantry.
but we had argentina 
where british pilots outnumbered by some distance still won air superiority for the most part
The Argentina military was nothing special. Especially when compared to a NATO country. Thats like bragging that the U.S and U.K military beat Iraq it was never even a contest. Not to mention the British military borrowed things from the U.S including an aircraft carrier several missiles and submarines.
Not by much and lets remember Argentina had never really been in a war before this.
A silly little war that was a desperate attempt to make the British belive they were still a great empire.