yaaaaaaaaa you guys shot missiles at them from 2 miles away, gret fucking dog fighting going on there. Andyour recent post about giving alittle ground for a grande scheme for overall victory, but i guess you guys just couldnt give up sandwich island could ya.
1 Like
you know, i think brittan has killed more brown people then any other country besides the countries that are native to brown people, by todays social logic, that makes them the most racist country ever. and i dont listen to ignorant racists…
I really dont give a damn if they did all that to brown people i just like to bring it up when they say the U.S was terrible to natives. Ive heard Brits say that the U.S has killed the most people directly int he world. I laugh and tell them about the things their ancestors did. And im not cutting the Nazis and slack what so ever but why are we so focused on what the Nazis did when the British empire, the Soviet union, and the Chinese killed far more than the Nazis did.
hold on you what haha both carriers deployed were british and the only submarine in the area was on of our nuclear subs . missiles are generally pretty similar between us and uk as we use the same manufacturers.
the US actually didnt support the british war effort in argentina . you wanted us to hand the islands over to the UN and for an agreement to be made , and this allowed one of the biggest grilings any us dipolat is likely to received by any world leader . maggie took no shit .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:775, topic:21032”]
A silly little war that was a desperate attempt to make the British belive they were still a great empire.
[/quote] not at all our land was invaded and british citizens were oppressed by a foreign power , what was we meant to do . sit back and allow it
thats what a modern dog fight consists of ? very few jets actually have a cannon on them anymore
reading uo on your quote i can for fact say thats untrue . you was looking into the possibility of lending us one IF we lost one the carriers being used in the conflict however it was never needed or set as a concrete plan
Nope look it up the United States was reluctant to support the U.K at first but they changed their minds. The USS Iwo Jima was lent to the British along with several subs and missiles. The U.S also provided the British other resources look it up if you dont believe me.
I highly doubt they were being oppressed. Argentina is actually a nice country and they get a lot of immigration from Europe and the United States. They wouldn’t be moving there if it was a corrupt oppressive place.
i suggest you read it up , i just did . you were CONSIDERING it if we needed it but we never did they were NEVER lent
it remained a contingency plan
i take it you dont know much about the Falklands then , when they were invaded all islanders were basically put under house arrest and treated terribly , the Argentinian government considered them illegals and not belonging there and treated them to that scale
this is just a film however the script was written word to word to what she said to the american diplomats and their requests
Nope swindwinder missiles that the U.S lent to the British were crucial to them during the war. Not to mention the intelligence the U.S provided the brits
Oh so the British were getting a taste of their own medicine you know what they say karmas a bitch 
ohh good god get your head out of your arse they were the standard fucking missiles equipped on our harriers before , during and fucking after the war . why do you americans feel the need to try and take glory for every little thing in history and twist it to "nope couldnt of done that without out us "
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:785, topic:21032”]
Oh so the British were getting a taste of their own medicine you know what they say karmas a bitch
[/quote] if thats karma ill take it all day long Argentina got shat on
Then why were they borrowed from the the U.S! 
I never you said you couldn’t have won the falklands without America i just said the missels were helpful that the U.S lent the British. The only thing i said you couldn’t have done with America was defeat Germany and Japan in world war 2. You’re the one who was trying to make it seem like Britain single handedly beat the Axis powers. Hell you even said Britain had defeated 99% of the Germans before American entered the war which we both know is complete and total bullshit.
I also dont take almost every opportunity to say “U.S troops suck British troops are better”.
borrowed ! haha what did we pick up the empty casing’s and give them back ! its called fucking trade we buy kit from eachother all the time .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:787, topic:21032”]
I never you said you couldn’t have won the falklands without America. The only thing i said you couldn’t have done with America was defeat Germany and Japan in world war 2. You’re the one who was trying to make it seem like Britain single handedly beat the Axis powers. Hell you even said Britain had defeated 99% of the Germans before American entered the war which we both know is complete and total bullshit.I also dont take almost every opportunity to say “U.S troops suck British troops are better”.
[/quote] have you ever read what i put .
i have maintained the same opinion i had now . WW2 was an allied victory in which all parties were vital in the defeat of germany and japan .
99% ! no i said we had defeated germany in africa and you were only invoved in the final kill them off offensive which is correct .
and i also have said that the allies could of still won without us support but would of taken many years longer
never have i ever said US troops suck . i have commented on areas in which US troops lack and areas in which they excel and if you recall in the same post i did the same for british troops and have done consistently.
never expect me to blow smoke up anyones arse .
COME ON ! LETS TUSSLE ALREADY !
TYPE AT ME BRO
We do have one thing in common at least any way
^^we are both run by spineless pricks
Yeah thats exactly what i was saying.
The U.S did help in Africa and they played a massive role in Europe and defeated over 70% of the Japanese army, navy and air force. the U.S was in the war all but a tiny portion of it,
Without U.S supplies the U.K would have no choice but to surrender to Germany. This next part is up for debate but in my opinion Germany wouldn’t be stretched thin on three fronts would go east with the bulk of their forces and defeat Russia. But had Russia still beaten Germany then the people in Europe would fair just as worse as they did under the Nazis. Japan had they not bombed Pearl harbor and kicked up a hornets nest would have taken over all of south east Asia just as they did in the real time line. But because the British surrendered to the Germans then Japan would steam role into India and the rest of the British controlled territories. But it was a good thing the U.S entered the war because no country at the time could match the industrial power and numbers the U.S had.
Ive seen you call U.S troops dumb cowboys and the only thing you criticize about the British is their lack of technology available to them.
. I was right in the middle of typing this when something came up unfortunately.
Couldn’t agree more 
Oh my god this women is absolutely fucking nuts.
1 Like