I study Religion as a hobby, Satanism (especially LaVeyan) is a structured religion.
You have no way of knowing that, besides he’s old the stress and fear of the trial could be enough to kill him. And since the average Brit seems to think guns are as lethal as nuclear weapons, i wouldn’t be surprised if hes locked up for a while.
Yeah, but on issues that were non-issues.
Care to rephrase that statement?
RT isn’t the only source ive heard that from, I first heard it from Paul Joseph Watson a You tuber who has been covering the migrant crisis.
Nope he won’t be put through a huge trial . For that very reason . As I said before our justice system is not as harsh as yours . In most cases it’s too fucking soft .
The trial will be pretty clear cut and most likely end up a fine . At worst a suspended sentence .
They always take into account his age . Because if they gave him the maximum sentence of ten years he would most likely die in there which they don’t want .
I saw you edit that. 
What do you know about our justice system? What are you basing this off of?
Again how do you know this? Are you telepathic?
Simply being put on trial could kill someone that old.
The U.S. is well known for having a very hard justice system and giving out very harsh sentences
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:7787, topic:21032”]
Again how do you know this? Are you telepathic
[/quote] because it’s a pretty routine case . The evidence is pretty clear and fuck all to argue about .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:7787, topic:21032”]
Simply being put on trial could kill someone that old.
[/quote] as I said that would be thought about and if he is unfit for trial they will deal with it .
Mope
Where are you getting this from? Sounds to me like you’re being a typical European and latching on to stereo types. If you looked, yes I’m sure you could find harsh sentences in a nation of 320 million people. I’m also willing to bet you could find many in the U.K as well. I personally know people who have gotten off very lightly for doing serious things.
He was found with an illegal weapon in his trunk. Surly that constitutes prison? After all an 80 year old man with a shotgun sure is a threat.
How do you know it will be thought about? Where are you getting all these details about this case? Are you a member of the jury perhaps?
Ill respond to your barrage of angry posts in the morning, i have to get some sleep.
I spent quite some time rolling up on this thread but couldn’t find it. Then I spent a bit of time on google and all I could find were arrests connected with terrorist anti-immigrant plots involving explosives or anti-immigrant demonstrations that turned violent.
Would you care to provide your source, please?
Nope it does not mean prison . It’s completely dependnt on his intentions .
Was he in fear of his life for whatever reason ?
Was he goinng after somebody ?
Was he simply transporting it ?
And it would be up to the jury to decide if he posed a threat .
Using @snejdarek as an example , if his CC liscence ran out on a Wednesday and he forgot to renew it (assuming you have to renew every few years ) and he was caught on the Friday carrying his weapon as usual but with a invalid permit . He would have to explain himself to the police/courts I’m sure .
But they are hardly going to lock him up . Because his intentions were not to harm any individual without just cause .
Going back to the old man . If he was in fear of his life for any reason (a legit reason ) such as being mugged and beaten up in the past and he had it in his Car for his own protection . They would take that into consideration . While it’s illegal to own a weapon for self defence , it would be dealt with on a case to case basis .
If the jury feel he was in danger he would likely get away with the gun being confiscated and a slap on the wrist .
Because that’s standard practice here . If your unfit for trial someone else can go in your place or you can use video link .
And I could be a member of the jury yes but I’m not 
Actually here the maximum sentence for simple illegal gun possession is 2 years. At the same time first time offenders sentenced to less than 3 years can’t get jail time. Courts can either give them suspended sentence or alternative punishment (usually public works, e.g. street cleaning).
Considering that I had a valid license up until a certain point (renewal is every 10 years and basically needs only new general practitioner health clearance - like old car drivers) and I was fulfilling the requirements at the time it lapsed, i.e. its issuance would be shall issue and only a simple administrative thing with the authorities not being able to deny it, it would be most probably considered as misdemeanor subject to a fine. A single misdemeanor would still not preclude me from applying for the license again (a person must commit 2 misdemeanors within 3 years to be precluded).
Meanwhile, the MINIMUM sentence for illegal firearm possession in UK is 5 years.
1 Like
Meanwhile in Norway.
A Czech family moves to Norway for a job opportunity.
Father is accused of abusing children. Children are taken away by social services.
Mother divorces father in order to retain children.
Father is cleared of all charges.
Children (2 brothers) are put to foster care to different Norwegian families. Mother can meet them twice a year for half-an-hour under supervision as is prohibited from speaking any Czech to them, or to show any emotions.
Mother fights for years to get children back. Other family members are trying to get them into their care too.
Children are put up for adoption with Norwegian families.
Madness.
1 Like
What’s the standard practice? Letting old people off the hook or letting felons go?
Doesn’t matter it still probably adds fear and stress. The article said he had a wife to take care off and he was concerned that if he went to jail she would die.
dont carry an illegal weapon then .
[quote=“SirWarriant, post:7797, topic:21032”]
What’s the standard practice? Letting old people off the hook or letting felons go?
[/quote] every case is looked at independently and the decided course of action is taken .
an old man with a shotgun isnt a huge deal . had it been a black gang member with a shotgun it would be a whole different story .
[quote=“snejdarek, post:7794, topic:21032”]
Meanwhile, the MINIMUM sentence for illegal firearm possession in UK is 5 years.
[/quote] true to a point but it depends on exactly what they chose to prosecute you for . if they perused a charge of possession of an illegal firearm , then yes you would face 5 years but they wont always . sometimes they will offer a deal where you plead guilty to a lesser charge . that way its cheaper for the government and such .
i found the follow up on the gentlemen . he was jailed for 2 years (a little harsh in my opinion) . they charged him for possession of a loaded firearm in a public place . he did infact hold a certificate for the gun . when police searched his house however . they found other weapons were not secure .
he has also lost his certificate and weapons/ ammunition
i highly doubt he will serve the full sentence because no one ever does here . much to my annoyance .
if you get a life sentence you will be out in 18 rather than the full 25 if you show good behaviour
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_BOY_SHOOTS_BROTHER?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT
looks like the gun control campaign is gathering up in the US .
Of course Obama has limited time, hence why he wants to confiscate them Australia style.
In regards to the story, thats a tragic accident and it seems like a weapons malfunction. Gun control would not have prevented his death. If the kid actually pulled the trigger than that’s on the parents for not teaching trigger discipline.
on the parents all the way . safety should be on until he is ready to fire . loaded gun , no safety on just laying on a picnic table ? you would have to be some sort of special cunt