Troll cave II

Off-topic
#5693

Of the 10,500 foreigners in British jails last year, nearly half – 4,600 – are citizens of other EU countries.

But yeah, I get your point. Whenever Czech police issue international warrant for a gypsy criminal, there is a sentence “presumed to be hiding in the UK”.

I don’t think that is what @sirwarriant is about. I believe he is - the same as me - perplexed by your focus on the EU immigration when 1) it is lower than 3rd country immigration, 2) cost-wise it brings net benefit to UK when it comes to taxes and expenses, 3) while there are problems connected to it, they are nowhere near the issues you face with your Muslim immigration, 4) their 2nd/3rd generation offspring will be 100% British taking over all of your values without hesitation and most importantly 5) even if they become 51% majority tomorrow, you would still wake up in a democratic country of equal citizens with the same core state principles - can you say the same about muslim majority UK?

1 Like
#5694

@TheDivineInfidel BTW this is what I personally consider most important when it comes to immigration to my country. Be it Ukrainian, Russian or Vietnamese, with all the issues we may have with them today, I see their kids doing well in schools and having the same core values as Czech kids. In 3rd generation the only difference will be in what they eat on Christmas - which is a special day not withstanding that they all are atheist same as the rest of the Czechs.

#5695

Which is possible, granted they come in small enough numbers. Mass migrations make assimilation nearly impossible, since they are not forced to interact with the hosts countries native population, they can simply stay with their group and thus not have to learn the language or culture. Growing up in an increasingly Hispanic town really taught me a lot.

The hispanics would stay with the hispanics, and the whites would stay with the whites.

1 Like
#5696

yes and i see that with alot of Muslims here that DONT live in the Muslim ghettos . there basically end up giving up islam in all but name …i see that in basically any type of immigrant that comes here when they come and actually integrate they do so very well .

the issue is when its massive numbers and they stick together . most british Muslims are no more Muslim in practice than i fucking am . the problem is much like the left wing the nutty cunts are very loud , very abusive and all stick together .

#5697

You still haven’t answered my question though. Do you really want Ethnic Britons (whites) to become the minority in your own country?

Why is it that Asian is for Asians, Africa is for Africans, but white nations are for everyone? In 100 years there will still be millions of Asians in Asia, but in 100 years whites will be the minority in Europe, their homeland and the land of their ancestors .

Why exactly does the U.K or even the Czech Republic need immigration. And i know you might argue for jobs no one wants to do, but those jobs are becoming increasingly automated, even fast food joints are turning to automation.

#5698

of course not .

because you get to experience other cultures . it enriches your society …when its controlled . its like a seasoning , when done right it compliments the meal , when done badly it ruins it :wink:

#5699

Well that is where you are heading. More people need to be willing to have uncomfortable conversations. Our ancestors died by the hundreds of thousands, a little discomfort is a small price to pay.

Aside from cuisine I bet you cannot name a single benefit to diversity. If our culture was so bad it needs enrichment, we wouldn’t have created the greatest society’s on earth, nor would people be lining up to get in. British culture made Britain the world power at one point, not Indian or Pakistani culture.

No one besides whites want or are told they need diversity. Because everyone knows it’s shit.

#5700

i dont disagree.

well from our diverse empire my country has enriched its athlete collection , found out about tea , took a shit load of gold , we got ourselves some slaves , perfected the art of war …i could go on .

#5701

just going to leave this right about here

1 Like
#5702

image
image.jpg486×1199 145 KB

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMGbIj_X0AEBssr.jpg

#5703

None of that is from Britain its self becoming more diverse. “Diversity” aka we want less whites, is a product of the mid to late 20th century, and of course the early 21st century. Britain was better when it was more ethnically homogeneous, and i think you wont deny that.

Your empire spanned diverse nations, and cultures, but you were not importing those cultures into your homeland, and thus destroying your own. I challenge you to name a single benefit to Britain become more ethnically diverse, hint you cannot.

Only “benefits” of there being less Brits, and more Pakistani Muslims are things like Rotheram, and acid attacks.

Ive seen the video, and although it does sort of glamorise colonialism, i agree with main idea. Typically the nations in Africa and south east Asia, that experienced longstanding governing by European rule are better off today.

Rhodesia (now known as Zimbabwe), and South Africa were once as prosperous as western nations. 1960s Salisbury, and Johannesburg looked identical to London, or New York city at the time. It was only after they whites were forced out of power, and in Rhodesia case had their land seized by the government, and in a lot of cases killed, that the countries turned to shit.

People demonise the apartheid South African government, but South Africa was far more prosperous and safe under it, than the shit awful mess Nelson Mandela created, (fyi he was a mass murdering communist psychopath responsible for multiple bombings, really no surprise the left loves him). .

#5704

ive always said the issue with the empire is it was disbanded far too quickly , anyone that thinks you can just abandon an empire that took hundreds of years to build and secure over night is an idiot . All we did was leave a bloody great power vacuum which fucked the lot.

1 Like
#5705

And the western powers mainly the U.K and U.S were responsible for the destruction of Rhodisa, and South Africa the only two stable nations on the continent.

All so we could show the world we aren’t “evil nazi racists”.

1 Like
#5706

thanks to a British left wing government at the time

#5707
#5708
#5709

Hey @TheDivineInfidel what is this shit? I read about five articles, all of them are saying about the same thing, but I am not sure if I understand it correctly.

#5710

And a complete lack of understanding of Africa. The idea that we think people who were living in the stone age for the last 10,000 years could embrace democracy and western values overnight without turning to shit is ludicrous. The west did not adopt these values overnight, it took us at least 2000 years to have actual free Democratic societies.

1 Like
#5711

not a clue , first time ive seen it mentioned. cant read the full article either without subscribing.

#5712

image
image.jpg1416×1202 493 KB

© 2015 Warhorse Studios www.warhorsestudios.cz