In my opinion you can’t compare it to a AAA title in this days because it has no lot boxes or the need for paying more cash for a additional save slots. 
No but your guna have to spend another $60 to see it’s ending when they release kingdom come : cashgrab 2
The ending and length of the main story is awful. Witcher 3 managed a begining middle and end with tons of actually interesting side quests.
And personal experiances, some people hit game breaking bugs nearly every quest and can’t stand the game anymore because of it. Opinions would be pretty much the same if everyone had the same experience.
Personally I am willing to cut Warhorse some slack here since they are a small, new studio, putting out a game that wouldn’t exist otherwise. I think quite a few other people might feel like this as well. If this was Bethesda or some other big studio then i wouldn’t feel the same, obviously.
Also regarding you point on the story or “cashgrab2”, the solution is simple - don’t buy the next game.
Compare it to nowerdays AAA titels and Witcher 1 when CD Projekt RED started and the AAA titels at that time to make a fair comparison.
How many pointless topics need to be created rehashing the same subject?
https://forum.kingdomcomerpg.com/t/disappointed-this-guy-was-right-about-kc-d-all-along/43531
https://forum.kingdomcomerpg.com/t/psn-refunds-uk/42713
https://forum.kingdomcomerpg.com/t/is-this-legal/46368/211
https://forum.kingdomcomerpg.com/t/think-this-is-a-joke/47796
https://forum.kingdomcomerpg.com/t/how-dare-you-charge-60-dollars-for-a-game-in-this-state/47492
https://forum.kingdomcomerpg.com/t/good-news-for-xbox-players/45804
https://forum.kingdomcomerpg.com/t/well-so-much-for-that-60-thank-you-note-to-self-never-buy-another-game-from-this-company-ever/40458
Don’t want it? It’s simple. Don’t buy it. You have freedom of choice just as they have freedom of delivering a product on their terms.
The same amount as people raving about how good the game is… seems only fair that both sides of the argument get aired out equally.
The same amount? Hardly… It’s always the same sorry few. And some people seem to have multiple accounts…
If your referring to me with the multiple accounts you will probably find that warhorse suspended my account for having an opinion on there game they didn’t agree with. As you can see from my comments here, I don’t swear or curse calling anyone names etc and most the time people were swearing at me and calling me names but I was the one suspended. When I questioned them they tried to say I was abusive which clearly isn’t the case. I just have an opinion that goes against this game so I accused them of censorship and they kept extending my suspension so I made another account to avoid dealing with them.
There’s a lot of YouTube reviews and fan boys that consistently seem to glaze over the fact this game is riddled. In fact with some of the YouTube reviews they feel bought and based on the fact they tried to silence me it’s not completely unbelievable. Sooooo for everyone all for the game raving about it painting it with sugar and rainbows, there’s people like me giving there opinion and take on it. As is their right when purchasing a product that doesn’t live up to its function.
i guess my main question if that if the patches have to go thru a “certification period” to make sure they aren’t broke where was the full games “certification period” and was everyone certifying the game drunk ? hahaha
Now a different Logic … AAA game, with a team having more members, more experience releasing bug infested game - Skyrim, which on the consoles was not fixed even after releasing GOTY as far as i know. Not to say that every TES and Fallout game is full of bugs, although its theyre engine and after all those years they should have the experience with it, yet, they do the same mistakes again and again.
Who has the biggest problem? 
Noone did that for the last decade. All pre-ordering away and after that people whine as usual. EA and other publishers have gotten away with it for a long time. If people would be angry for that a long time ago and stick with their guns, none of this shit would have happend in the first place. Some people hypocritism are just going trough the roof. I for once i love this game, even its broken. I did not want another witcher3 or Assasins Creed Clones. Remember they were also very buggy at the start. But since they fixed the problems people forgot about it.
I paid less for Withcer 3 GOTY, than for this game, but I still enjoy every bit of my money spent, lol. At least here I already know that I will be doing second playthrough right away. And I had less bugs than in Fallout 4 or Skyrim.
Your little rant over? I thought your account was banned. Must’ve made a new one.
Damn, I had lots to say before your silly fan boy remark. Now I can’t be bothered. Cheerio…
is this a compliment? cuz I see it as a compliment to WH they achieved so much with there low budget.
Again, people enjoy the game. Is that really a fucking crime? They spend their money the way they want to, and choose to purchase the game. If the like it, cool. If they don’t like it, refund it, wait for bug fixes, etc.
You are worse then the people who think the 60$ base price tag should be increased.
Yes this game is full of annoying game breaking bugs. I have side quests I can’t turn in without the game breaking. However I have 260 hours in, I’m not bored, and I’ll probably play another 200 hours. It was worth the 60 dollars for me. I just hope they fix these issues and balance the game.
indie vs AAA - you seem invested in labels. not sure why.
caveat emptor: if you bought an overpriced product, that’s on you.
rubbish? FO4 was released in Nov 2015. it’s been modded and patched like heck and yet there’s the following post from last month: 38 Common Fallout 4 Problems & How to Fix Them
perspective: PC Ultima in 1986 ran about $40. in today’s money about $90.